This always happen to me. I think the game is unfair. Because uhm for example
1. (Username) - 7.15s
2. (Username) - 7.15s
I think it's unfair. And i suggest that, that should be double first.
Example:
1. (Username) - 7.15s
1. (Username) - 7.15s
Let's show fair. (I don't know if this idea is taken ._.)

/Support
I doubt something like this will ever be implemented but it's annoying that it comes down to ping.

....

I

You know time goes BEYOND that right?

For example, the first will get 7.1535s while the second one gets 7.1567s...

/nosupport

Xinaug a dit :

....

I

You know time goes BEYOND that right?

For example, the first will get 7.1535s while the second one gets 7.1567s...

/nosupport

to the point it's pure ping

if they got it in the same hundredth of a second then either one could've turned up first based on ping frankly, just because the number is more precise doesn't mean it's more even

-_-

Xinaug a dit :

....

I

You know time goes BEYOND that right?

For example, the first will get 7.1535s while the second one gets 7.1567s...

/nosupport

Exactly. No support.

Xinaug a dit :

....

I

You know time goes BEYOND that right?

For example, the first will get 7.1535s while the second one gets 7.1567s...

/nosupport

Yep, pretty much this.
/No Support

/support

That's actually a good idea c:

/Support
Happened to me 2 times yesterday

Xinaug a dit :

....

I

You know time goes BEYOND that right?

For example, the first will get 7.1535s while the second one gets 7.1567s...

/nosupport

this
/no support

/subport

arata ca draq de urat aceasta poza

/no support