Answers for History questions. |
Gabreyolo « Citoyen » Membre 1386595560000
| 0 | ||
^ Who read this |
0 | ||
^Chemist |
0 | ||
woah....too many boring article for last some posts especially subho's post... xDD |
Gabreyolo « Citoyen » Membre 1386597720000
| 0 | ||
Subho a dit : ^ Good luck for him |
0 | ||
No u didn't understand what i was exactly trying to say...i'll try to be as clear as i can here.. First of all, Many religious Scriptures portray different images of GOD..The Bible says,"God created Man in his own image." The Koran says this as well..(idk what the Gita says or any other religious scripts)..Science says He is The ultimate form of energy and yes as u said part of God is in us....yes i agree that is true..but du know?? The 2nd law of conservation of Energy says,"Energy can only be converted from one form to another," this is the continuation of the 1st law which states,"Energy can Neither be created nor be destroyed," and yes by LAWS i mean "they are laws" and laws have been stated only after thousands of tests and proofs so there is a very rare chance that a law can be proved wrong..(expecially the law of conservation of energy this law cannot be proven wrong)..so the 2nd law actually says that The ultimate Energy that is GOD is the source of all forms of Energy and yes all other energies are converted from this Ultimate Source called God...but there is no source for this Energy called God..that means "GOD this form of ultimate enrgy defies all laws of conservation of energy and is much more that an Energy.." This is wt Science says about GOD the ultimate source of Energy..and yes the electron the electron revolves around the atom bcos it is a LEPTON and yes i wrote about LEPTONS in my earlier Science thread take a look at that..u will clearly understand why the electron revovles around the Atom..and yes if the electron would not spin around the atom it would be subjected to positive force of protons in nucleus resulting in a force of attraction of electron towards nucleus resulting in annhilation of the entire universe(yes a single electron being subjected to force of attraction towards protons in nucleus could annhilate the universe since the universe is made of protons and electrons actually to be specific the universe is made of quarks and leptons)...a similar thing is with the solar system if the earth would not revolve around the sun, Earth would be subjected to the SUN's enormous gravitational force resulting in its annhilation..SO WHAT i was trying to say clearly is that GOD is A form of ENERGY (The most ultimate form of energy) and a form of Energy cannot be a LIFEFORM according to Science..and if u think THAT there's another mystery behind this Ultimate form of Energy then perhaps ur wrong!! Cos Everything that exists now is a converted form of that ultimate form of Energy and no other thing has created that Energy...IT IS THE 1ST and LAST, THE ALPHA and OMEGA, The BEGINNING and THE END. [(this was all in terms of Science not religion didn't mean to hurt any1s feelings :)] so Science can't exactly say Wt does GOD look like? but some answers cannot be answered by Science and only true belief in something answers these questions..Finally, I will end by saying this "Do not depend on Science for everything, Sometimes Grandma's tales solves the biggest, unknown mysteries too." |
0 | ||
Nice text. I like last lines. |
0 | ||
Lol kristuuux..ty for that compliment ..will keep that in mind |
0 | ||
At that place calling god an energy you broke the defination of the word "god" according to us, god means a figure or a thing which can control everytthing that can control everything at his own will. But energy can not control everything as its own will because it can not make decisions. That is one of the points making your argument invalid. |
0 | ||
THAT VERY-SUPER-EXTREMELY-AND ABSOLUTELY LONG TEXT,I JUST READ THE FIRST LINE AND LAST LINE XDDD |
0 | ||
Subho a dit : i will have to make things clear....i would suggest doing this in private :) |
0 | ||
I get what you mean, but Energy is not what we know as god ok? If you credit it to god then its right! But if you wanna keep the concept of god as it is in religion, then it is wrong. |
0 | ||
Still,u don't get me..ok..lets just dig and bury this here..lets do this on fb the next time we meet..if u wanna continue the hunt..wt du say?? i guess this is quite a debate we got here. |
0 | ||
We have started it, and we are also into it up to our necks. There is no turning back now, chemist. We would soon be found continuing it in facebook! |
0 | ||
history, eh? how was the philippines colonized by the spaniards then the japanese then the americans? HAH ANSWER THAT |
0 | ||
By going there. I aced your question. |
0 | ||
Subho a dit : Lol....a great reply by Subho here..this actually shows that Subho is very slow to anger and takes his decision wisely whereas Alikha lemme tell u one thing this thread is made so that u may get the answers to your questions and not to test others of their knowledge plz try to get me...hope i made my point :) |
Yoshiorigin « Citoyen » Membre 1388826720000
| 0 | ||
I want to ask a question. Who found the english language we now use today? and how did he/she found out abou this language? |
0 | ||
Yoshiorigin a dit : Let me tell you something....A language is never found by only 1 person, its found by many people slowly and steadily, and a long after that grammar is formed. English, is no exception. English was started being spoken long ago and many people knew it for a long time. Mostly in England. But, the count for existance of english language started from English year counting. That is , 0 A.D. onwards. So, Theoritically present english language is 2014 years old. But practically , crude english took place a long before that and present english took form much after that. For instance, the english spoken by William Shakespeare around ~1616 A.D. and also written by him has almost no similarity to english langauge of mordern date. But it is also english. This, Though we can not exactly know when english langauge was "invented", we know, that is officially came into count from 0 A.D. |
0 | ||
One thing has puzzled me is that, What exactly happened in the crusades during the dark times?? and is there any significance of it happening? plz answere would love to know it :) and yes if u could just explain each and every phase briefly, that would be good..thx |
0 | ||
Firstly Let me come to the dark times. A long time ago, before Christ, to be exact, the dark period was not going on. It was the old light age, with some great philosophers (called philosophers but they were more like scientists). For Example, Archemedies invented crude laser sometime around 300-400 BC. But from then to the recent devlopment of laser in last century, no trace of that has been found. It certifies, that the old knowledge was lost in the middle time and we had to refind it, which made us go back for another thousand years. The time, when we were striving to refind it but it was not at hand, is known as the dark age. Europe was in darkage from about 0 A.D - 16th Century A.D (time of Rennisance) . Now, Crusades during that time was an endless war declared against the muslims who were on agression upon europe by the European Christians. The first crusade took place under pope Urban II when the Islamic took away their holy land of Palestine with jerusalem. In the First crusade the took back Those places. After the 1st War, the places were again taken by the Islamic and so began the 2nd crusade, under leadership of Louis VII of France and Conrad III of Germany . This crusade was a failure and both of them lost most of their Armies. Accordingly , to infuse patrioitism and to take back their holy land, becan the 3rd crusade. It had many kings such as Fedrick Barbarrosa (I don't remember the exact spelling of his name sorry) , Richard I of England, Etc. In this war, the leader of the Islamic people was Saladin. And He drew the war by poisoning sources of water and retreating close to capital until only Richard I of England was left. Then, the two of them, fought a great battle, in which Saladin Defeated Richard one. Richard told Saladin that he will come back after three years to take back Palestine and Jerusalem and to this , Saladin replied that if he had to do Lose Palestine and Jerusalem, he would lose it to no one on earth but Richard I. This was a great praise of a Military Leader by Another great Military leader. The crusades went of for a more or less time of 100 years so they are known also as the 100 years war . ( bet you heard of this)...... And The results, The results are seen even today, You know, Most african countries have Islam as their National Religion, whereas All European countries , with the exceptinon of Turkey, have Christianity as their National Religion. Hope you Understand, if you wanna know something else, ask me, I will try to tell you as much as I know about it! ^^ |