Thanks :), i see that "The crusades went of for a more or less time of 100 years so they are known
also as the 100 years war . ( bet you heard of this)......"...but i have heard of Hundred years war of something like a war between Kingdom of England and Kingdom of France for the french empire....so is that 100 years war something same to wt 100 years war im talking about?

Those are Different. This is named the 100 years war. Crusades are named crusades, but they took more or less than 100 years.

Subho a dit :

Those are Different. This is named the 100 years war. Crusades are named crusades, but they took more or less than 100 years.

then why did u say they are also known as hundred years war?

Winjid a dit :

then why did u say they are also known as hundred years war?

To make my meaning clear that they went on for almost 100 years.

Don't mean to offend u but plz answer this question of mine...Why did Hitler hate and kill the Jews? and I have heard about a person called Yosef Goebel behind all this..who was he?? plz answer didn't mean to offend u :)

Hitler hated the jews because the jews were primarily the reason for the defeat of germany in WW1 cuz they did not provide with financial support when when they were asked to. So Hitler thought of them as betrayers / traitors. And secondly, the reason which the americans spread later and is partially true , is that because he did not want the mixup of aryan race of germans with the jewish race of different origin.

Joseph Goebel/ Yosef Goebel was a German Polititian and the minister of propaganda in the National Socialist Germany. The Final Decision (decision to kill the jews) was taken by the german senate. And He, as a minister was obviously on of the members of the senate. And Thus, he is known as one of the people who was behind it.


He was also the Chancellor of Germany for 1 day, from 30th April 1945 (The day Adolf Hitler Suicided) to 1st may 1945. On 1st may, he and his wife and all their children suicided.

Hope you understand.

so actually just because of strong dislike towards Jews that actually turned to Hatred later was the reason the Jews were massacred??? and yes is it right to take another's live just because of strong hatred towards them??? well not according to me..Lt.Col.Tim Collins(He is an army Lieutenant Colonel and yes by that i mean he must have killed many enemy soldiers yet he respects Human life and doesn't violate it) says it is not right to take another Human "Life" and it is not to be done lightly..yes i emphasized the word Life bcos taking a single life too isn't right..How could a person be so unsensitive and vile that he ruthlessly killed the Jews and violate so many Human and Civic laws..

Well firstly, by the amount he hated them he did not cosider them to be Germans, so he drove most of them out, not as many were killed as many as the americans say now, You know, Even Albert Einstien was allowed to leave, he was a german jew too. And anyways, "Human and Civic laws", What probably adolf Hitler Belived, and Personally I belived too, is that, for war, there are no rules. "Everything is fair in love and war" ....this was said by the ancestors in the old light age because after a war only 1 side remains and the other side is extinct. So no one is left to show how actually the won the war. They write history in their own way. Yes, I am directly saying that history is not fair, but it is partial. But one must judge it by his own strength and based on the character of the person whom the subject is about and then compair it with history to attain a concept, to what truly might have happened. Yes, I did that, I read wiki, books , bla bla, consulted with me dad and some more people , i read Adolf Hitler's quotes and learnt about his personality and then I judged the incidents myself and also heard other's reviews, that made me understand that these facts are not at all rightous and correct. In fact, most of them were made up after the defeat of Axis force in WW2 by the Allied force's powers of England and America. But since till mordern date they are the most financially and technologically devloped countreis, they are manipulating most human minds in the world. Even today, 10 out of 100 germans are in favour of Adolf Hitler and the National Socialist German Workers Party. But they don't say it openly because if they do, they will be severely tortoured and punished. That is Reality, all of us, are directly or indirectly controlled by the winners. And thats why, whatever means one employes in war are right if the war is won. And ALL of them are wrong if war is lost.

First of all, I strongly disbelieve in the quote "Everything is fair in love and war." lets say Love is an emotion of affection and attachment..then War is the exact opposite Hatred and Aggression and most of the population of this world actually uses that phrase to cover their mistakes and neglect others opinion and advice..such people are hard-headed and wont change their decision..no matter what.! in a way that is quite good but most of the time it is unethical..even our comrades or our brethren may leave and forsake us coz of this attitude..and i think u got it wrong..Albert Einstein didn't leave.......he fled. Well according to me, War is never won..only lost, even though a side wins it actually loses because of the amount of casualties and other economical losses..

Winjid a dit :

First of all, I strongly disbelieve in the quote "Everything is fair in love and war." lets say Love is an emotion of affection and attachment..then War is the exact opposite Hatred and Aggression and most of the population of this world actually uses that phrase to cover their mistakes and neglect others opinion and advice..such people are hard-headed and wont change their decision..no matter what.! in a way that is quite good but most of the time it is unethical..even our comrades or our brethren may leave and forsake us coz of this attitude..and i think u got it wrong..Albert Einstein didn't leave.......he fled. Well according to me, War is never won..only lost, even though a side wins it actually loses because of the amount of casualties and other economical losses..

Firstly, Yes he fled because he had to, what i meant was that he was not killed. 2ndly, I think everything is fair, because that is the way, you have to win, if you don't exist then you can't do anything! Without existing there is not place for right and wrong, first you must survive, anyone who disagrees to this one is a big show off and is just saying it and will do what i am saying if a war really breaks off. And on the topic, War is not done without a reason that both side will lose it, its done for survival . And for specific other reasons. And because of that, the side winning does win. And According to casualities, it does not lose, sometimes low population is better than population like India. If there is food for 100 and there are 5 people, there won't be any problem, but if there is food for 100 and 10000 people, there obivously would be problem. In fact it would be another war, a civil war. And economically it is not ruined either because the area of the side defeated comes into its area, and so it can use up things which are in that are too, thus benefeciating it hugely.

U see, ur ideas/ideologies and mentality relating these kinds of sectors is heart-breakening..i mean that literally..and on the 2nd hand in which u try to discourage the opposing debater by saying that he is a show-off is a wrong and unethical way of proving YOUR points right...and the phase wherein u refer to Existence and survival may perhaps be right, But a war is not won by any side!..casualties are not to be happy about, those casualties are the ones that actually make a war win (according to u), but according to me a war is one only when it is conquered by peace....U crush the enemy by making peace with them, that's like throwing burning incense on their heads..suppose, a loved member of yours dies in a war...will u be happy that.."hey we ve just lost a loved member cmon lets celebrate...there will be less strain on the food supply yay!"..cmon is that hw u will react..if yes, that shows hw u character and personality is then...and by doing this im not proving my point or arguement right..im just trying to awaken u from all this deception and thinking u have been blinded with..and War always has a reason..i agree, but that can be avoided by peace! "Any war can be avoided..We MUST END WAR B4 ENDS US!!!"....and Albert Einstein fled not because he had to..he fled bcoz he is human and he had his choice in which he took his decision wisely..so, emphasize on wt im trying to convey here..and understand it...change ur thinking about war...see wt im trying to convey.. My great Leader, Einstein said.....the release of atomic energy has not created a new problem.....It has merely made more urgent the necessity of solving an existing one..War is not good..not for us, not for them and not for GOD as well...unless its the WAR OF GOOD OVER EVIL..in which GOOD ALWAYS PREVAILS! EDIT: plz forgive me if i hurted u through the words i spoke..plz especially in the one in which i spoke about ur family member..ok?? plz

How can you write so much stuff without having a headache? O.O Although, I do have a question :I its not really about History, but it happened like, millions of years ago, so yea. Do you know why there are different religions? Like, there could be only one, but people chose to make many. So why?

Raramra a dit :

How can you write so much stuff without having a headache? O.O Although, I do have a question :I its not really about History, but it happened like, millions of years ago, so yea. Do you know why there are different religions? Like, there could be only one, but people chose to make many. So why?

i would love to answer that...but unfortunately Subho has to do it :)...this thread was made by Subho... :)

Winjid a dit :

U see, ur ideas/ideologies and mentality relating these kinds of sectors is heart-breakening..i mean that literally..and on the 2nd hand in which u try to discourage the opposing debater by saying that he is a show-off is a wrong and unethical way of proving YOUR points right...and the phase wherein u refer to Existence and survival may perhaps be right, But a war is not won by any side!..casualties are not to be happy about, those casualties are the ones that actually make a war win (according to u), but according to me a war is one only when it is conquered by peace....U crush the enemy by making peace with them, that's like throwing burning incense on their heads..suppose, a loved member of yours dies in a war...will u be happy that.."hey we ve just lost a loved member cmon lets celebrate...there will be less strain on the food supply yay!"..cmon is that hw u will react..if yes, that shows hw u character and personality is then...and by doing this im not proving my point or arguement right..im just trying to awaken u from all this deception and thinking u have been blinded with..and War always has a reason..i agree, but that can be avoided by peace! "Any war can be avoided..We MUST END WAR B4 ENDS US!!!"....and Albert Einstein fled not because he had to..he fled bcoz he is human and he had his choice in which he took his decision wisely..so, emphasize on wt im trying to convey here..and understand it...change ur thinking about war...see wt im trying to convey.. My great Leader, Einstein said.....the release of atomic energy has not created a new problem.....It has merely made more urgent the necessity of solving an existing one..War is not good..not for us, not for them and not for GOD as well...unless its the WAR OF GOOD OVER EVIL..in which GOOD ALWAYS PREVAILS! EDIT: plz forgive me if i hurted u through the words i spoke..plz especially in the one in which i spoke about ur family member..ok?? plz

Chemist, In war, there is only 1 target, Survival, the one side to survive , even if 1 man, wins. That nation wins the war. Casualities are not counted. In any kind of war, lets say i pick up fight with you and I defeat you but get a bone broken, will i say "We both lost cuz i lost a bone too!" ? No! I will say that I won. IF you win, you won't say that " Yeah he landed a tough punch on my nose, its a defeat for both" , You will say, its your victory. Because in war, there is not brotherly relation. Its Hatred. Hope you get me.

Raramra a dit :

How can you write so much stuff without having a headache? O.O Although, I do have a question :I its not really about History, but it happened like, millions of years ago, so yea. Do you know why there are different religions? Like, there could be only one, but people chose to make many. So why?

Religion , was , in the glorious old light age, a way to make common people belive in scientific things by telling that god told those things, and different religions occured in different places, such as Hinduism in Indus Valley, (There is another thread for its origin). Then , After the Primary ones were made, such as Hindus, Jews, etc, Some people from these groups made some more, such as Jesus made Christianity and Mohammad Made Islam(Muslim).

Like that, it happened that the Primary religions fell short. Like, at 1st, there were many jews, but then christinaity came, jewsus was orignally a jew too. After that many jews left jewism and took up christianity. After that Islam came, and many more jews and some christians took up islam, like that, right now jewism is only the religion of Israel. it was not even that for hundereds of years. After World War 2 they were given this power because the Helped the allied force a lot. Thats a different topic now.


Anyways, As I was saying, Hinduism is also limited now because it does not take new people as it was not founded by 1 person, but it has the thinkings of the old Indus Valley Civilisation. And , Continuing on the subject, The latter religions such as Budhhism and Islam are much more open than older ones.


So my saying is that, The primary ones were made becasue of reasons in the first paragraph and the others were made in the middle dark age where people's mind was taken over and they blindly belived most things, thats when majority of these headless religions popped out and a lot of people followed them too. They were orignally made by men, not god, who seeked to be powerful and famous but did not have any other talent that lying well and putting the lies well, and obviously a good memory! Cuz not everyone can put up so many things for self in such a way that none will understand
and think its for them!

Can i know Indian history?

If u remember right...or read the extract i wrote..i don't have any problem relating existence or survival...The only problem i have with war is..."Why du have to walk on the path of Warfare, when u can avoid casualties and walk on the path of peace..", and yes u say Casualties are not counted...thats another mentality of being Ignorant to those who actually made their side win the war..U know wt expert Generals of modern times say, they say a War is not won by Dying for ur country but making the enemy bastards die for theirs.." if u interpret this..it would mean that casualties actually form a major part of a war..u cannot possibly say that they are not counted..the opposite country retreats when their morale is destroyed and that only happens when the rate of casualties increases...no country would be so foolish that it would it fight till the very end even knowing that they are completely destroyed and annhilated...and the phase wherein u say WE BOTH FIGHT cannot be compared to something so big as A WAR...and literally speaking there is no War wherein only 1 man has ever survived bcoz if it would be both the warring countries must have been extremely foolish bcoz they haven't retreated knowing that either of the both had destroyed the morale....u get me....so in short words I'm just saying that NO NEED TO WAR WHEN U CAN MAKE PEACE...that's all i'm trying to say from the very beginning...(ALL THAT I SPOKE HERE WASN'T MY OWN WORDS OR OPINIONS...I HAVE DONE A COLLECTIVE DATA ANALYSIS ABOUT THIS..PLAYED REAL TIME STRATEGY GAMES, FIRST PERSON SHOOTERS...HEARD SPEECHES OF WORLD FAMOUS GENERALS, etc...)

well, hate to say this but....ur threads are written nicely and made attractive...(the spacing, the paragraphs...etc...), good work...keep it up..but don't worry when u write for me...i just want whats inside...i don't care about the appearance :)

Thank you Subho.

Winjid a dit :

If u remember right...or read the extract i wrote..i don't have any problem relating existence or survival...The only problem i have with war is..."Why du have to walk on the path of Warfare, when u can avoid casualties and walk on the path of peace..", and yes u say Casualties are not counted...thats another mentality of being Ignorant to those who actually made their side win the war..U know wt expert Generals of modern times say, they say a War is not won by Dying for ur country but making the enemy bastards die for theirs.." if u interpret this..it would mean that casualties actually form a major part of a war..u cannot possibly say that they are not counted..the opposite country retreats when their morale is destroyed and that only happens when the rate of casualties increases...no country would be so foolish that it would it fight till the very end even knowing that they are completely destroyed and annhilated...and the phase wherein u say WE BOTH FIGHT cannot be compared to something so big as A WAR...and literally speaking there is no War wherein only 1 man has ever survived bcoz if it would be both the warring countries must have been extremely foolish bcoz they haven't retreated knowing that either of the both had destroyed the morale....u get me....so in short words I'm just saying that NO NEED TO WAR WHEN U CAN MAKE PEACE...that's all i'm trying to say from the very beginning...(ALL THAT I SPOKE HERE WASN'T MY OWN WORDS OR OPINIONS...I HAVE DONE A COLLECTIVE DATA ANALYSIS ABOUT THIS..PLAYED REAL TIME STRATEGY GAMES, FIRST PERSON SHOOTERS...HEARD SPEECHES OF WORLD FAMOUS GENERALS, etc...)

Chemist if you only wish to say that when we can make peace we should resist war, i can also prove it wrong.


Firstly from the point of view of mine,

We don't have enough resources on this earth to support so many people, because during peace, mortality rate will be low and mortality age will be reallly high, how will we even feed them? ultimately that peace will also be broken, and what will happen will be civil war, which will practically be worse than world war. And if not so, life forms on earth will cease to exist due to lack of food.

2ndly, from the view of Charles Darwin,

He said "Struggle between two species and also Interstruggle between one species keeps going on for survival " , And human, being the highest level of species and being too many in number is also haven interstruggle . And a gigantic form of that is war.


We can not stop it. For it is part of our origin, our past, as well as our hope and freedom and survival's only way and thus also our future.

see, now you are going to an entirely different aspect...To deal with food and resources...one has to Reduce---> Reuse----> and recycle...i entirely agree with the point u try to convey wherein u speak about lack of resources and increasing population...and u say a war is a good way of bringing it down...i don't agree to that point entirely ..that is why..Wise scientists these days are not finding ways of increasing food supply but actually trying to get rid of waste...du know Earth has only 18 years more to accommodate our waste...and if we on a personal level start taking this seriously..believe me a small step of millions of people around can bring marvellous changes...and the question wherein u ask..How will we feed them?...will actually be solved when we actually start walking towards the path of(Reduce---> Reuse-----> Recycle) and help managing waste....and if u don't realize this, Natural disasters too help to reduce population to maintain natural equlibrium...ok??? and perhaps...i can guarantee u...The creator of this Earth knows when the population has to be brought down...not me and you or anyone...ok??? so...War actually has to be avoided by any means possible...War is done only for hatred and survival...War doesn't care if the population is decreasing...It only cares that..I PREVAIL...War is an outcome of extreme hatred and agitation and it has only 1 purpose that is Destruction..and I as a scientist will say,"War is the Science of Destruction."...And as u started about this, I would take this an oppurtunity to tell u that i as a citizen (not a scientist)..have found a process to dispose the biggest menace and most prominent form of waste i.e. Thermocole (polystyrene)...and actually using the by-products of the process for an even better use for the benefit of Mother nature! (Details of my process will be written later..only if interested) :)