When did the first organism come to life [multicellular] and what was its name?

Paduman a dit :

When did the first organism come to life [multicellular] and what was its name?

a wrong place to ask this question bro... The question u ask relates to Paleontology i.e the study of ancient life.. whereas History is that part of Science that deals with the study of Past... xDD should i answer??? didn't mean to intervene though

Winjid a dit :

a wrong place to ask this question bro... The question u ask relates to Paleontology i.e the study of ancient life.. whereas History is that part of Science that deals with the study of Past... xDD should i answer??? didn't mean to intervene though

I know the answer, but not in detail. So Very well, You may answer. I am not going to miss the opportunity to learn something new.

Subho a dit :

I know the answer, but not in detail. So Very well, You may answer. I am not going to miss the opportunity to learn something new.

If u recall, I am trying to learn a virtue called Discernment :) u may answer this one.. i really have to work on tis virtue.. Answer it! its an order from the Chemist.

Hmm since both of u are capable of answering this both can ans and sorry for posting at wrong place

PAdu, 1st multicellular organisms apreared about 1 billion years ago. ( Approx, since no one was standing there with a stopcock)

I'd like to ask about wars I wanna know about India vs Pakistan wars I know that Subho you know this better then anyone I'd like to ask you that who won the most wars and when did the wars happen and how and why (pls answer to my question)

Along with kins quetion plz answer to this too how the battle of kargil was fought? and what had happened in the war of east and west pakistan[ about the role of india]

Kinsleyvip a dit :

I'd like to ask about wars I wanna know about India vs Pakistan wars I know that Subho you know this better then anyone I'd like to ask you that who won the most wars and when did the wars happen and how and why (pls answer to my question)

Well, Firstly, There have been many wars between pakistan and India since the Independence. And Directly or Indirectly the war is going on every moment even in the present second. The reason for these wars is however , The region of Kashmir in the border of India and Pakistan. The Wars between India and Pakistan Are Collectively known as Indo-Pakistani Wars.

1. The Indo-Pakistani War of 1947:- Right during Independence,kashmir was ruled by the Maharaja (king). He was given the choice to join any of the two newly Independent Nations of India and Pakistan. The pakistani Forces sent army into Kashmir and Captured it Forcibly. So the Maharaga Signed to give Kashmir to India. So The Indians went to the UN security Council and it passed resolution 47 on 22nd April 1948. The war ended when the line of control was made and pakistan got the Northern and Western part of the state and India got southern, central and north eastern parts of the state.


2. The Indo Pakistani War of 1965 :- This war occured following the Pakistani Operation Gibralter, Where the pakistanis wanted to put their forces in Jammu and Kashmir. This time India launched a full scale attack resulting in the largest tank battle since world war two. This war was ended when the Uk And USA diplomatically intervened and the Declaration of Tashkent took place. Both India and Pakistan Claimed victory in this war, however most neutral records are more than enough to prove that India was one step advanced than Pakistan.

Paduman a dit :

Along with kins quetion plz answer to this too how the battle of kargil was fought? and what had happened in the war of east and west pakistan[ about the role of india]

The next two stanzas are for both you and Kin the next two paras fulfill your answers. The others are only for kin.

3. The Indo-Pakistani war of 1971 :- This war is really special . This war was the only war which did not occour due to the issue of Kashmir. This war took place due to the opposition of the Leader of East Pakistan Sekh Mujib and the Leader of West Pakistan Yahya Bhutto. At this time the forces of west pakistan were in east pakistan and they were tryign to keep it under control by harming civilians, so following operation searchlight and such, MANY bengali east pakistanis took place in West Bengal, Assam and such places of India adjoining east pakistan. Soon, war broke out and it was of a large scale, it must be remembered that in this war also indian soilders fought wearing the clothes of east pakistanis because at that time east pakistan did not have much of an army. In this army, Both sides suffered loss. This war saw the highest number of casualities in any of the Indo pakistani Wars as well as the largest number of prisoners of war ( about 90,000.) Since the second world war. A pakistani Author remarked, that in this war , "Pakistan lost half of its navy, a quarter of its air force and a third of its army force." And The east pakistan was declared as the new, independent nation of Bangladesh.


4. The Indo-Pakistani war of 1999:- This war is also known as the Kargil war. In this war , the pakistanis also put their forces inside Kashmir by breaking the line of Control and also captured some places especially in the Indian district of Kargil. The Indian government decleared a major artilery and diplomatic offensive to drive out the pakistani infiltrators. Fearing large scale military conflicts, the international community (led by the USA) , put some pressure on pakistan to retreat the forces from India. By july 1999 the activities of pakistani terrorists in the state of kargil had decreased.


These were the major wars between India and Pakistan, Many wars beside these were also faught and many are also being fought as I remarked earlier. There are also campaigns and operations which take place time to time.

PS: There are also neuclear Conflicts.

I tried to help, but if you need any more help, ask me right away and I will try to help you as much as I possibly can.

Do you know albert einstien? What did Einstien did to the earth and why?

Yes, even though my answer might offend the chemist's beliefs about him, I can tell you. And well, please understand I am only telling what I know and it is in no way meant to hurt anyone's mental sentiments.

So, Albert Einstein was born in present Germany, where he was a moderately known truly educated man but from religion he was jewish. So, when the National Socialist German Workers Party came into power he had to leave the country and so he went off to present USA. So, after he went there he did a lot many things, from The theory of E= MC^2 to the theory of relativity and also to some minor changes in the Bose-Einstein Theory which was originally given by Indian Professor from West Bengal, Satyendranath Bose and he mathemetically also proved the existence of WRAP holes there. He also studied and gave some features of Uranium.

But on the negative side, he was the person, who on the request of many other people, wrote to the Government of America to provide funding for the development of atomic weapon research because he was one of the most learned mean of the nation and would not be denied. And thus, he was one of the main people responsible for the Massive loss of Wealth and Human life which occoured due to the dropping of Atom bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in September 1945.

Thus, we can say that even though, as a unidirectional thinker he did do a lot of things like giving good theories and some completely new parts of science, he also did equally negative things to bring his net credit to more or less the neutral.

Yes you're right. He actually ended up being kind of neutral only.

Winjid a dit :

Yes you're right. He actually ended up being kind of neutral only.

Finally you agree, Kemsit!

Subho I got a simple question for you Histogenius :)

In a way relative to the technological development, how did most new discoveries change the way of thinking in humans ?
starting all the way from Ancient Egypt, in science, until today , how did those crazy inventions and theories put the old commun and popular ones in prison even though the misleading ones were dominant ? and most importantly how did they change the world we live in today ?

Broabdel, NO don't worry i won't answer this question.. I'm just here to let you know that FoD Forum isn't active as it was earlier.. Subro doesn't visit it a lot as he used to.. So don't be discouraged, if he doesn't answer.. The next time i find him online, I'll let him know there's something waiting for him here :D Ciao!

@Abd, okay, I'm here, now let me attempt to satisfy your query with one answer, because I've seen that you actually are one of those people who prefer compactness of detail. So lets proceed:-

Before anything else, I would like to ask you why you spoke of Ancient Egypt , why not Ancient Rome or Greece or even the Ancient Indian Civilizations (The Indus Valley Civilization/ The harrappan civilization). Please do answer this question.

Next, 'In a way relative to the technological development'.... Please do not use that term... Technologies develop, that's true, very true, but that works in a parralel way to all other systems.... The way humans think isn't always effected by the technological development.... In fact, technological development is like advancement of ages, you just simply find that you have advanced and situations and mentalities are different from the conventional ones... That's the next age then , the new age.....

So, starting from the ancient time, new discoveries go on all the time.... That's something all of us are used to.. that is going on all around us all the time so that's nothing questionable and to be honest it changes the flow of history, but VERY gradually.... So... I must assume at this point that you speak of the drastic developments that sometimes have been seen to have taken place at certain historical points... Like Archimedes invented crude laser guns, for example.... So yeah, those 'crazy' inventions.... They were mostly done by people who were, mentally, way ahead of their time... Perhaps a few centuries, even more, in cases. But anyway, although they were so advanced, the contemporary society was not always as advanced.... Tell me, when you give a concept of a gun to a mongoloid group who lives in deserts and uses whatever they get at most, what is its value to them? What do they think of it? Nothing... the case was exactly same with these people in most cases.... The ones we still have in history are just a few examples... MANY such inventions and in fact many such inventors have been entirely forgotten because the then society was not yet ready for that... The same thing was discovered, perhaps a thousand and five hundred years later by someone else who got the credit...

So, the misleading ones were dominant... You know that, that's a good thing... But look... 'misleading' isn't the right term... The people who actually deal with knowledge never have the time to look after other things... because acquiring, deciphering and conveying knowledge takes more time than one living being can possibly afford..... So the right word, would, instead, be 'inferior'.... Like Socrates stated, "One of the penalties of participating in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors"....... So, as I said in my last paragraph, those people, those 'mentally inferior people', were the ones who were in the leadership... And that is exactly why they were often punished... They were punished when what they said, although it was true, was often against the conventional views from which the then rules drew their power. So they took them as opposition to their throne...

How did they change the world we live in today?

In cases, tremendously.... In most cases, however, they were forgotten long ago and are now being re-discovered by other people who get all the credit and yet the work with these is delayed by a few centuries or in cases a few milleniums even.

What was the point of WWI?

Cyanny a dit :

What was the point of WWI?

What the point of all wars are.