griffincraft a dit :

birdluv a dit :VoirMasquer

griffincraft a dit :VoirMasquer

birdluv a dit :VoirMasquer

griffincraft a dit :VoirMasquer

lordfuzzy a dit :VoirMasquer

Then it was Toy Freddy. Simple.

Do you mean, "Toy Freddy cause the Bite of '87"? I highly doubt that... Whats your proof?

As said above. You might be right there, considering that toy freddy was just pronounced "freddy."

huggykitty a dit :VoirMasquer

Birdluv a dit :VoirMasquer

I believe it to be Freddy. There is a poster hanging up somewhere in the games stating the 'rules' of the pizzeria for the kids to follow. One of them are as followed: "Don't touch Freddy." Why not any other animatronic? That doesn't make sense, unless Freddy bit the child.

Yes, I'm not sure why the poster says this. Maybe it'll be revealed in FNaF 3. But Freddy or any of the old animatronics can't be responsible for the Bite of 87, because the Bite takes place during FNaF2 where the old animatronics just rot backstage. They don't come out to see the kids.

Birdluv a dit :VoirMasquer

Scott confirmed that the Mangle is indeed a male, so there is no need to discuss this point any further.

When and where?
But people here are getting tired of this debate.

I thought someone posted a video saying that it was confirmed?

Oh nononono It's only a theory video, but I found it pretty solid in proof so umm.. I just typed 'Confirmed'
If.. That's what.. Confused you

ohh alright ;w;
Scratch that out then haha

Sor-ree

what

birdluv a dit :

griffincraft a dit :VoirMasquer

birdluv a dit :VoirMasquer

griffincraft a dit :VoirMasquer

birdluv a dit :VoirMasquer

griffincraft a dit :VoirMasquer

lordfuzzy a dit :VoirMasquer

Then it was Toy Freddy. Simple.

Do you mean, "Toy Freddy cause the Bite of '87"? I highly doubt that... Whats your proof?

As said above. You might be right there, considering that toy freddy was just pronounced "freddy."

huggykitty a dit :VoirMasquer

Birdluv a dit :VoirMasquer

I believe it to be Freddy. There is a poster hanging up somewhere in the games stating the 'rules' of the pizzeria for the kids to follow. One of them are as followed: "Don't touch Freddy." Why not any other animatronic? That doesn't make sense, unless Freddy bit the child.

Yes, I'm not sure why the poster says this. Maybe it'll be revealed in FNaF 3. But Freddy or any of the old animatronics can't be responsible for the Bite of 87, because the Bite takes place during FNaF2 where the old animatronics just rot backstage. They don't come out to see the kids.

Birdluv a dit :VoirMasquer

Scott confirmed that the Mangle is indeed a male, so there is no need to discuss this point any further.

When and where?
But people here are getting tired of this debate.

I thought someone posted a video saying that it was confirmed?

Oh nononono It's only a theory video, but I found it pretty solid in proof so umm.. I just typed 'Confirmed'
If.. That's what.. Confused you

ohh alright ;w;
Scratch that out then haha

Sor-ree

what

'Sor-ree' = Sorrryyy

just wanted to post this
this is a theory by "SuperGamer177"

huggykitty a dit :

Hi Lordfuzzy, you play Nekodancer don't you? I was wondering why your name sounded so familiar.

Yes I play ND.

Ah the 'Foxy is a good guy theory'

Is there a theory as to why Foxy is "Out Of Order"?

Did a little search, found a great theory:
In the Foxy Atari 2600 minigame, Foxy exits the cove and sees five children. Everyone's happy. It repeats a second time. But on the third try, you see the Purple Guy. And he's smiling. For some people, this is evidence that the Purple Guy is the Phone Guy. He's smiling as a reference to the Phone Guy saying that Foxy is his favourite. But the point is this: this minigame is based on the Missing Children Incident. There's five children, and on round three of the minigame they're dead. The point is that Foxy was somehow involved in the Missing Children Incident. What his role was I'm not sure. And this is why he's 'Out of order'.

huggykitty a dit :

Did a little search, found a great theory:
In the Foxy Atari 2600 minigame, Foxy exits the cove and sees five children. Everyone's happy. It repeats a second time. But on the third try, you see the Purple Guy. And he's smiling. For some people, this is evidence that the Purple Guy is the Phone Guy. He's smiling as a reference to the Phone Guy saying that Foxy is his favourite. But the point is this: this minigame is based on the Missing Children Incident. There's five children, and on round three of the minigame they're dead. The point is that Foxy was somehow involved in the Missing Children Incident. What his role was I'm not sure. And this is why he's 'Out of order'.

People who think Foxy caused the Bite of '87 typically believe THAT is why he's 'Out of Order'. Evidence for him causing it is how his jaw appears broken. But when he enters your room during his jumpscare, his jaw starts out closed. How could this be if his jaw is broken? Also, during the second game he is shut up with the other old animatronics, therefore there's no way he could've caused the Bite of '87. Same for Freddy. Of course this leaves one possible canidate, Mangle, but we've discussed this topic enough so I'll stop.
Huggy, that theory does indeed make sense, a little. But there's a problem with the evidence that 'Purple Guy is Phone Guy'. Purple Guy could just be smiling rather creepily because he was about to kill the children. I want more proof for that theory, if possible. Because that just doesn't cut it for me.
But if Foxy had something to do with the murder, or rather if he was framed, it would make some sense that he's 'Out of Order', but, well, WHEN did the incident happen? If it didn't happen near the first game, being 'Out of Order' just wouldn't make sense. If Foxy was framed before that game, why not just eliminate him and replace him with a new animatronic?

E: Well not before that game but before that resturant.

I think The Game Theorists cover that of the purple man pretty good

griffincraft a dit :

I think The Game Theorists cover that of the purple man pretty good

Really? I'll go check it out.

I'm agnostic towards the 'Purple Guy is Phone Guy' theory. I'm slightly inclined to believe it just because it would be such an interesting twist. Anyway, the main piece of evidence that PG is PG is in his appearance:

What's that he's holding? I really don't what it could possibly be besides a phone. It symbolically represents the Phone Guy. But it's always hard to to tell with the Atari's graphics. Another thing is the yellow thing on his body. It's thought to be a security guard badge. It is known that Phone Guy is qualified to be a security guard. There a lots of other little pieces here and there which all add up; but there's one big hole in the theory, and that's that it states on the newspaper clipping in the first game that 'a suspect was named and arrested' meaning that the murderer was caught. The Phone Guy is still around in the first game, thus, he couldn't of been caught. The obvious response would be that 'they caught the wrong person'. But surely they've got CCTV in Freddy Fazbear's Pizza? And there's a few other little bits and pieces which cast further doubt. This is sort of a basic summary of the main arguments. I could go on forever.

As for Foxy and the Missing Children. It says on the newspaper clippings that it happened on June 26th. What year though? FNaF 2 by the way takes place between 8th of November and the 14th of November. Also contrary to popular perception, the children weren't murdered all at once. It says on one newspaper clipping that 'two children went missing' and on another 'five children are understood to be missing'. I think the Foxy minigame proves that Foxy definitely had something to do the murder, just what exactly? The Atari games are meant to be symbolic, not 'this is what literally happened'. Why wasn't Foxy scrapped completely? Well, you could say that with quite a few things about this game. Why does the pizzeria continue to exist when it heavily violates laws regarding workplace safety?

Anyway, I now think that Foxy is 'Out of order', because well, he just is. Electronics break down from time to time. Especially considering Freddy Fazbear's Pizza is on the brink of bankruptcy. Maybe Scott just the put the sign there to have an excuse to make it say 'IT'S ME' when Foxy leaves the cove. Just to creep the player out.

How Withered/Old Bonnie lost his face:
Old Bonnie: You think you can replace me?
Toy Bonnie: ....
Old Bonnie: *pulls out guitar and strums nicely* Beat that.
Toy Bonnie: *tries out guitar a little, Old Bonnie smirking at him. Suddenly, rocks the guitar so hard that Old Bonnie's face flies off*
The End :)
Lol ok that was a joke and sorta goes against the prequel thing even though I think it is a prequel so idk, I just thought it was kinda funny. it was a comic on google images :P

Hmm. I wonder if there are any theories on how Withered Bonnie lost his face... Surely kids couldnt have done that. It seems like someone with a far stronger grip ripped off his face, since there are wires attatched and the upper part of the endoskeleton is not there. What about the arms? The endoskeleton limbs were also torn off. The cloth seems thick, so it cant have been someone unarmed without any tools. And the tear is clean and smooth round on the head.

Or maybe Im just wondering about shit already answered..

Obviously a purple hotdog.

i have a theory















































Purple guy is purple

DON'T touch freddy.
here. have a reason why they just dont want ya to.

Also,

kay. bye.

^Thats the Mangle

Duhhhh
i know right

Well Bonnie's face is probably gone so they could use parts for the new animatronics.
Or maybe its because they possibly aren't finished

if you mean withered bonnie
if i remember correctly phone guy said the old animatronics were scrapped, and were replaced with the "toy" animatronics,
and the older animatronics were used for parts then.
so they probably did use it for the new animatronics