Dunald a dit :

So you're saying school isn't learning?
That school is just like copy pasting wikipedia..

So you're saying people who go to school are .. ''People like him''?

In school the teachers tell you somewhat of how so YOU can figure stuff out yourslef then have YOU do it yourself, in impures vids it's just copy what i did and there you got something new now realy on my next video for other shit. >:I

Mousechris a dit :

In school the teachers tell you somewhat of how so YOU can figure stuff out yourslef then have YOU do it yourself, in impures vids it's just copy what i did and there you got something new now reply on my next video for other shit. >:I

Nah, in school, the teachers show you how to do things, then you must learn to apply it to your work yourself.
It works the same with Impure's videos. He shows you a mechanism, and you must effectivley apply it into map making.

Hatoncat a dit :

Nah, in school, the teachers show you how to do things, then you must learn to apply it to your work yourself.
It works the same with Impure's videos. He shows you a mechanism, and you must effectivley apply it into map making.

Then the people who teach you don't teach you. you should find a school where they TEACH TEACH you, not do it for you.

Mousechris a dit :

Then the people who teach you don't teach you. you should find a school where they TEACH TEACH you, not do it for you.

It's not doing it for you if they show you what do before you do it for yourself. It's teaching. I think your problem is that you don't learn, you just say they don't teach you, and try learning it on your own.

Hozaku a dit :

Ad Hominem: You attacked your opponent's character or personal traits instead of engaging with their argument.

Ad hominem attacks can take the form of overtly attacking somebody, or more subtly casting doubt on their character or personal attributes. The desired result of an ad hom attack is to undermine one's opponent without actually having to engage with their argument or present a compelling argument of one's own.

Why don't you start addressing the fact that you treated the exact same solution suggested to you completely differently, just because it was from someone else?

P.S: This applies to Beastmatt too
Lmbo.

It applies to Fxie as well.

If you go to the early pages you can find this:

Fxie a dit :

Since you criticize all of my suggestions

Oops

Infact, that is the exact reason I am mainly bashing her. She mostly went on this suggestion because she had a grudge with mousechris criticizing her suggestions, as you can see the way she replied to the thread.

So if you see me comitting "Ad Hominem", it's just me mocking what she did by herself.

DERP.

Beastmatt a dit :

It applies to Fxie as well.

If you go to the early pages you can find this:
Infact, that is the exact reason I am mainly bashing her. She mostly went on this suggestion because she had a grudge with mousechris criticizing her suggestions, as you can see the way she replied to the thread.

So if you see me comitting "Ad Hominem", it's just me mocking what she did by herself.

Oops

Yea, that might be, But Fxie's argument against the suggestion are valid.

Hatoncat a dit :

Yea, that might be, But Fxie's argument against the suggestion are valid.

That doesn't matter, it still applies to her.

It also applies to the reason I am doing that to her. No true hate or arguments here for me, I just don't like people who can't accept the other side.

I can't understand grudges against other people for not suppporting their suggestions so they don't support the other person. I think that's really childish.

Yuvii a dit :

I can't understand grudges against other people for not suppporting their suggestions so they don't support the other person. I think that's really childish.

So do I.

Yuvii a dit :

I can't understand grudges against other people for not suppporting their suggestions so they don't support the other person. I think that's really childish.

This is exactly what I am pointing out. Mousechris didn't like Fxie's idea so she would start opposing him and his suggestion.

I noticed that, so I have been recently doing the same with her.

Beastmatt a dit :

This is exactly what I am pointing out. Mousechris didn't like Fxie's idea so she would start opposing him and his suggestion.

I noticed that, so I have been recently doing the same with her.

He does the same to her though. They have a very special relationship.
This thread is getting way off-topic.

Mousechris a dit :

I don't criticize all of your ideas fxie, i supported the putting all locked threads down at the buttom, i like threads that are simple and easy and i like threads that don't change
I also supported Topic-53156 It was a great idea but i still think you would need to talk to the map creaters, then you hurt my feelings by saying mean stuff about me ;_; i've never said anything mean about you, and if i have i'm sorry you could tell me what i said. -gives flowers- I think your avatar is pretty and cute :3 can't we just be friends? Just because we have differant opinions on life and differant ideals and differant brain sides doesnt mean we can't be friends, right?

^

Edit: You two should just stop arguing because the purpose of this thread was to think about it, support, or not support but STATE A REASON instead of pretending the idea is yours. Suggesting an alternative way is fine but arguing about how your way is better and the thread should be locked is not.

Hatoncat a dit :

He does the same to her though. They have a very special relationship.
This thread is getting way off-topic.

Agreed, they are very close together.

When was the last post that was mainly talking about the original post? Lets get it back in drive.

I think the ground will supply an easier way for map editing. The ground is not mandatory, so you can still go on with the other contraptions.

Mousechris a dit :

Mousechris said:I don't criticize all of your ideas fxie, i supported the putting all locked threads down at the buttom, i like threads that are simple and easy and i like threads that don't change
I also supported Topic-53156 It was a great idea but i still think you would need to talk to the map creaters, then you hurt my feelings by saying mean stuff about me ;_; i've never said anything mean about you, and if i have i'm sorry you could tell me what i said. -gives flowers- I think your avatar is pretty and cute :3 can't we just be friends? Just because we have differant opinions on life and differant ideals and differant brain sides doesnt mean we can't be friends, right?

Aww, cute. Did fxie reply?

Anyway, still support. It saves using grounds and people can make use of it to create mechanic maps.

I will say it again. There are many ways you could do this and save grounds, Impure has done it, I have done it, Fxie has done it, Hazuko has done it... This suggestion is uneccesary and would be a waste of the admins time.

Beastmatt a dit :

Aww, cute. Did fxie reply?

It's all on the second page

Hatoncat a dit :

I will say it again. There are many ways you could do this and save grounds, Impure has done it, I have done it, Fxie has done it, Hazuko has done it... This suggestion is uneccesary and would be a waste of the admins time.

The admins have recently been wasting their time on a lot of new uneeded updates, so this could be nessacary at the moment.

*Wink*

^
Such as the survivor update, the bots removed, etc.
They are the unnecessary ones but we can't do anything about it.
If this suggestion was implemented, we don't HAVE to use it, we can pretend it isn't even there. Not so with the recent updates.

Yuvii a dit :

^
Such as the survivor update, the bots removed, etc.
They are the unnecessary ones but we can't do anything about it.
If this suggestion was implemented, we don't HAVE to use it, we can pretend it isn't even there. Not so with the recent updates.

The graphics change was not at all nessacary.

Neither was adding sand,stone,grass and dirt ground when all we could have was normal ground.

But it would always be better to have it implemented than having a self-made one. It would just make things more easier and simple. With this ground you can have a simple one-way gate any length and place you desire.

But of course the width compared to length would be limited, so no fat blocks can just be placed everywhere.

Beastmatt is basically saying "I'm a hypocrite, aren't I unique."

This suggestion is bad because it's bad. The reason I replied to it instead of other bad suggestions is obviously because he first goes to every suggestion I make and creates nonexistent flaws within them then denies how fictitious they are while continuing to catastrophize and shunning the positive aspects of them.

So fair game, I'll point out REAL problems with this suggestion, which no matter who suggested it I would not ever support because this is a gross idea that's aesthetically and functionally flawed for the reasons I've pointed out before; but since you were too busy bashing me for my username and disregarding my posts entirely here's a synopsis of why this suggestion sucks:

1. The graphic cannot represent the ground. I don't want to see the shit in the screenshit in any map. God please no. That is aesthetically displeasing by all means.

2. This simply cannot work as a ground. I've demonstrated this already: when you make it wide, how will you make sense of the split? How will the graphic even represent the split? The first post is implying there will always be a roof and a ground surrounding this ground. Who says people are going to do that?