@7068732

(Removido)

@6426592 Apparently i've already posted this before, where it got "left as is".

@7014627

@7029003

@6395187

@7075014

@7075241

@4632172

@7075521

@7072669

@7001009

@7076408

General notice in regards to this review:

If your map did not receive a comment, it was because I don't see a way how the map could be improved to be worth P1.

If you made a collision map, in most cases, please avoid keeping the default gravity, it only makes it tedious for mice to have an enjoyable time. Gravity from 5 to 7 is the most convenient number to make your map fun to play on. Also, you should avoid cramped paths so that mice can make use of the space they have to get a lead. Even though collision is pretty luck based in terms of spawn, this can make collision kind of an unpredictable, yet enjoyable race.

If you made a soulmate map, it wasn't good. I don't think any of the soulmate maps I looked at was playable. It always lacked something, whether it was the fact it was generic, or even the fact it had random aspects that didn't make it a good soulmate map. Please avoid using grounds such as trampolines when you're making a soulmate map. I know a few maps in rotation that actually use these very specific grounds, but in opposition to the maps that were submitted to P9 last month, the maps that are currently in rotation use it in a clever way. Furthermore, straightforward static maps where one of the mice goes under a defined ground and the other goes stays at the top aren't interesting. Try to make being soulmates something different than a generic P7 or P9 map, not a maze where you must wait for the other to do something in order to move on.

If you made a map that was something other than collision or soulmate and you didn't get a comment, the concept you used was not interesting, it might be better to try to refine it so it's actually fun to play on, but you might also aim at some other concepts you have. Also, some maps have amazing concepts, yet it simply needs to be looked into a bit deeper, until you find an interesting use for your map. It is also possible your map suited more another category. If that's the case, your map still wasn't good, because I would have commented on it if it were.

Needless to say this was expected from a review where anyone can submit their map, regardless of their expertise in map making. Some maps were decent, where others we're good at all, but that should tell you what your strengths and weaknesses are. Take a look at the maps that were P1 in this review and you'll see that you don't necessarily have to make the most complicated things for your map to be decent.

If your map unfortunately didn't make it to the P1 list, make sure you adjust it to the best of your abilities, or start again with another map, maybe your next map version will.

---

Left as is:
@7047600 - Tiojeje -
@7074412 - Tiojeje -
@1385222 - Jotatavo -
@2167814 - Jotatavo -
@6922618 - Papelio -
@7046117 - Zaptoliti -
@7046112 - Meenosqq -
@7045574 - +Mistersacri -
@7047860 - +Mistersacri -
@4776411 - Lolfakie -
@5010050 - Lolfakie -
@2984419 - Shalander -
@7046947 - I_Eat_Cheese -
@7048781 - I_Eat_Cheese -
@7047288 - Pudimcb -
@7047547 - Aj0307 -
@6991137 - Victorgabino - Interesting concept, though the execution isn't the greatest.
@7056214 - Victorgabino -
@7050878 - Viptoto -
@7045293 - Veroveraar -
@7045364 - Veroveraar -
@6861101 - Thegbc -
@6718605 - Framnm -
@6330687 - Jfrl -
@3448104 - Jfrl -
@1490606 - Danielmago -
@1521445 - Danielmago -
@580942 - Leaomestre - The map doesn't play too well since the grounds are too light.
@1846347 - Aksale -
@527941 - Rikkeshang -
@1257223 - Rikkeshang -
@7054637 - Yuugiooohhhh -
@7073392 - Kyclet -
@7055246 - Kyclet -
@7055559 - Vmsqevms -
@6984855 - V1n1returns -
@7004394 - Mquk -
@6790396 - Mquk -
@7009704 - Maxislow - The upper part is uninteresting and ruins the "fun" aspect the map could have.
@5899993 - Zombiewd -
@5899999 - Zombiewd -
@7019443 - Meenosqq -
@6300148 - Viniciusdara -
@7052951 - Shirubin -
@6534835 - Gobbek -
@7060473 - Censere -
@7061367 - Undearctic -
@6932846 - Jnathanbr -
@6932788 - Jnathanbr -
@7060215 - L0ngx -
@5076948 - Nukualofa -
@7063113 - Trackswagy -
@7064775 - Ahyenn - This is not a troll map submission.
@3382899 - Garyarcanine - There are 0,0 sync issues with this map.
@7055814 - Bruno4ponto0 -
@6931423 - Pjfsamora -
@7068010 - Elhectordm -
@7069087 - Elhectordm -
@7068437 - Maniaderato -
@7068523 - Maniaderato -
@7068732 - Oliwier2717 -
@6426592 - Awesomehobo -
@7029003 - Sajtor -
@7075014 - Gorrillaz -
@7075241 - Thermitez -
@4632172 - Apollopolo -
@7075521 - Runeblast -
@7072669 - Guguwrx -
@6218444 - Lucasrslv -
@6186786 - Lucasrslv -
@7076408 - Brunosonia -


P1'ed:
@6667228 - Tdft - Low replay value, but still alright.
@7049294 - Tdft -
@6934999 - Leaomestre -
@7055130 - Mumich -
@7058786 - Tioyudis -
@6740181 - Gobbek -
@7025898 - Lassapq -
@7067378 - Okpatinhos -
@7014627 - Brunosonia - That could be enjoyable for P1 I guess.
@6395187 - Obsyt -
@7001009 - Tdpnice - I must admit I had hope for this one, though the paths were too cramped so it didn't play too well in rotation.


Will be discussed:
None


Ignored:
@4686354 - Noisnacoca - Posted more than 2 maps (#3293)
@4848644 - Noisnacoca - Posted more than 2 maps (#3293)
@4848693 - Noisnacoca - Posted more than 2 maps (#3293)
@7052804 - Sdysywj - Posted more than 2 maps (#3328, #3338, #3339, #3340)
@7068679 - Sdysywj - Posted more than 2 maps (#3328, #3338, #3339, #3340)
@6930472 - Sdysywj - Posted more than 2 maps (#3328, #3338, #3339, #3340)
@7068725 - Sdysywj - Posted more than 2 maps (#3328, #3338, #3339, #3340)

@6928284

@7077999

@7079457
@7083283

Deleted

@6964780