[Reactions] Recent Changes, Updates and Announcements

Haruhitastic a dit :
Nothing happened, it was a joke.

dat barry

anyway as for the new update

I'm not sure what to think really, it sounds like it's for a cause but I also don't really think it's nessisary, imagine if every player made a duplicate thread explaining the same bug, sure tig would find that bug

but would he find the OTHER bugs?

#3942

Nothing happened, it was a joke.

#3943

No; that's kinda what everyone's been saying.

#3944

We brought up all of these concerns everyone has about the Bugs section with Tig, however he still insists that not locking these threads helps him understand about the problems people have on a better level. I know bugs may look more messy as a result, but if it helps him address bugs and issues faster and more efficiently then in the long run it should be worth it.

Johnlantern a dit :
There are three types of modules:
1: Official module scripts, those that have a special # room.
2: Unofficial scripts, approved by admins, those that can be loaded with /module in tribe house but have no special # room.
3: Unofficial scripts, not approved by admins, those that can only be loaded with /lua in your tribe house by regular users if you happen to have the code.

2 and 3 are really quite different because the difference is that one is admin approved while the other is not...and that actually means one of them can be loaded with /module and you don't need to find the code. So having an unofficial tag for admin approved modules would be quite helpful :)

I'm sure you know all this but it's just that from a user stand point, it's actually helpful to have these.

To be honest I didn't realise that, although I still feel having unofficial tags next to every thread would be overkill. That's just me though.

#3945

Whiskypickle a dit :
Severe rule breakers on the forum now run the risk of earning in-game bans alongside forum mutes. This will only be for extreme cases, honest or small mistakes won't earn an in-game ban.

As always everyone is free to give their thoughts on the matter in the Reactions thread. Topic-64554

YESSSSSSSSSSSSSS should've done this eons ago.

#3946

whats with the thing whisky told what if done by mistake

#3947

Omg!!!!

#3948

Kingfawas a dit :
whats with the thing whisky told what if done by mistake

Then resolve it with a mod like you're supposed to.

#3949

Kingfawas a dit :
what if done by mistake

Whiskypickle a dit :
Severe rule breakers on the forum now run the risk of earning in-game bans alongside forum mutes. This will only be for extreme cases, honest or small mistakes won't earn an in-game ban.

Note the 'severe' and last sentence.

#3950

Not really a fan of the update but whatever

Just another way that could possible count towards ingame ban, is when people post on behalf of a muted person. But there should be a valid reason, such as

> [Badmouse] Hey dude can you say to that Iamconz guy that he is ugly

You should ban the "Badmouse" ingame for however long, and mute/warn the guy for posting it

But if it's something like this

> [Badmouse] Get Prosouris to add me ingame

then it could be overlooked I guess

just a suggestion~

#3951

Problem is whispers aren't dealt with though. :\

#3952

Yeah, I keep forgetting the "ignore and move on" fineprint rule...

#3953

What is the line between severe mistakes and honest mistakes?

#3954

I assume if we were meant to know, examples would've been given.

#3955

I take it that things such as double posting, creating question threads etc. will be overlooked?

but others such as CP should receive in game bans IMO.

#3956

Haru is right in the sense that we don't want to give examples out of what would and wouldn't cause a ban, but small things like double posting won't receive them. Like I said, severe cases will get bans.

#3957

YES THANK YOU SO MUCH I LOVE YOU SENTINELS <3

#3958

this is stupid but ok do what you want

#3959

It's not stupid. If you do something like share CP or hack links or private servers on this forum I think you deserve an in-game ban too because you could do similarly there.
It's just a preventative measure.

#3960

Oshoe a dit :
this is stupid but ok do what you want

Not stupid; don't break severe rules etc. and you won't have a problem. It's the person's fault if they decide to pull one of those severe cases.
But yes, a good addition to the punishment system.

English	Français
Português do Brasil	Español
Türkçe	Polski
Magyar	Română
العربية	Skandinavisk
Nederlands	Deutsch
Bahasa Indonesia	Русский
中文	Filipino
Lietuvių kalba	日本語
Suomi	עברית
Italiano	Česky
Hrvatski	Slovensky
Български	Latviešu
Estonian

Langue