Wingedmousie a dit :

/No support, this really isn't needed in my opinion. It doesn't take too long to make an account.

Guests as in people invited by /inv.

Below my ideas on how this might work. I'm only supporting this and my own version of it if we simultaneously get a permission setting for the use of /inv and /invkick by tribe members, meaning that you can configure which tribe members are able to invite others.

With the above condition met, I see only one way to make rights for tribe house guests work. Just like there is by default a "Spiritual Chief" rank with all permissions and a "Stooge" rank with no permissions at all, a default rank for tribe house guests should be made.

By default this rank, let's call it "Tribe Guest", has no permissions. Permissions that have nothing to do with the tribe house are to be greyed out completely, others can be turned on.

This way, it's up to the tribe leaders to decide what guests can and can not do, just like it's up to them which members can invite guests and which can't.

Bottom line: This feature will always be prone to be abused, but these modifications to the idea should make it manageable for those who opt in (by enabling permissions) while nothing changes for those against the idea.

Lemodile a dit :

Below my ideas on how this might work. I'm only supporting this and my own version of it if we simultaneously get a permission setting for the use of /inv and /invkick by tribe members, meaning that you can configure which tribe members are able to invite others.

With the above condition met, I see only one way to make rights for tribe house guests work. Just like there is by default a "Spiritual Chief" rank with all permissions and a "Stooge" rank with no permissions at all, a default rank for tribe house guests should be made.

By default this rank, let's call it "Tribe Guest", has no permissions. Permissions that have nothing to do with the tribe house are to be greyed out completely, others can be turned on.

This way, it's up to the tribe leaders to decide what guests can and can not do, just like it's up to them which members can invite guests and which can't.

Bottom line: This feature will always be prone to be abused, but these modifications to the idea should make it manageable for those who opt in (by enabling permissions) while nothing changes for those against the idea.

Yes, I can get on with this.

easy trolling for people :P

Lemodile a dit :

Below my ideas on how this might work. I'm only supporting this and my own version of it if we simultaneously get a permission setting for the use of /inv and /invkick by tribe members, meaning that you can configure which tribe members are able to invite others.

With the above condition met, I see only one way to make rights for tribe house guests work. Just like there is by default a "Spiritual Chief" rank with all permissions and a "Stooge" rank with no permissions at all, a default rank for tribe house guests should be made.

By default this rank, let's call it "Tribe Guest", has no permissions. Permissions that have nothing to do with the tribe house are to be greyed out completely, others can be turned on.

This way, it's up to the tribe leaders to decide what guests can and can not do, just like it's up to them which members can invite guests and which can't.

Bottom line: This feature will always be prone to be abused, but these modifications to the idea should make it manageable for those who opt in (by enabling permissions) while nothing changes for those against the idea.

/support

Erm for Lemo's idea
I'm confused with the other idea '.'