[Reactions] Recent Changes, Updates and Announcements |
Alexa172001 « Citoyen » 1580770260000
| 2 | ||
Ikke a dit : I did notice but you should realize they only closed the applications 4 days ago so I don't see how they'd reffer to this round of apps as "previous" given they didn't even review the applications yet. Dernière modification le 1580770320000 |
6 | ||
Alexa172001 a dit : Technically the applications that just closed (January 2020) are now previous ones, regardless of if they've hired any players from those applications or not. Which means what they're saying in the announcement post is that Alfiecakes was not hired from the 2020 applications, but from the July 2019 ones. |
5 | ||
Congrats Alfie!! ♥ Knowing how hard you work in Fashion Squad, I'm certain you are gonna be great as a mod. |
Alexa172001 « Citoyen » 1580770860000
| 0 | ||
Then it would be great to have a mod confirm. Also they could state "They were hired from these apps" instead. It causes confusion and it's not so hard to add 2 words to a sentence. |
Inkzooka « Censeur » 1580770980000
| 7 | ||
Alexa172001 a dit : When Staff states "they were not hired from the previous round of applications..." when new moderators are announced, it means that they were not from the most recent application period (in this case, January 10th, 2020 -- January 31st, 2020). We usually say this to defer any kind of confusion. Alfiecakes was not picked from the most recent applications and were hired previously during another hiring period. Mods go through a an extensive period where they receive the necessary training before becoming a public moderator. This time is indefinite, but definitely not 1-4 days long. This is why we feel the need to clarify that new staff might not have came from a recent hiring period. |
5 | ||
Alexa172001 a dit : I personally fail to see how it's confusing, especially knowing that the admins can't legally hire anyone that is under the age of 18. I think you're looking too far into it and getting yourself confused by it. |
Alexa172001 « Citoyen » 1580771100000
| 0 | ||
I don't see how that needs to be clarified when it is PURELY OBVIOUS they wouldn't hire anyone without even going through the applications. I know training is a thing which is exactly my point. Seriously...If apps that weren't even reviewed yet are called "previous"....Amen. |
Alexa172001 « Citoyen » 1580771220000
| 0 | ||
a dit : He could've applied while being 17. Being 17 when apps closed yet being 18 once they finished reviewing the apps (Since they take a while) hence still being accepted. Even so,isn't that against the rules then?~ |
17 | ||
It’s not your concern as Alfie wouldn’t have been hired if they weren’t 18. The technicalities of when they applied doesn’t matter. What does arguing about it achieve? Also, we’ve been reviewing this application cycle continuously since it was opened. Though we’re still reviewing, since they’re closed, it’s fine to call them “previous.” |
Alexa172001 « Citoyen » 1580771640000
| 0 | ||
It proves a point. You guys are god damn biased. And that still makes 0 sense calling something that isn't DONE being reviewed and you wouldn't pick anyone from previous. It is my concern as a player 'cause you guys are more secretive than Hain itself. Scary shit. |
12 | ||
I don’t see how it appears we’re being secretive since Admins wouldn’t allow us to hire someone under 18 even if we tried. We have fully explained this miscommunication and I edited the post to be more clear, which doesn’t seem very biased or secretive. Dernière modification le 1580771880000 |
Lelianna 1580772000000
| | ||
[Modéré par Gavin, raison : Please do not flamebait other users] |
11 | ||
Alexa172001 a dit : It states that an applicant can apply even if they are 17, if they turn 18 by a set date. It wouldn't be illegal to apply when you're underage, but as long as you've turned 18 by the time mentioned in the post, it's fine. If they're 17 when applying, they won't be hired until they've turned 18 either way. This is exactly how it works for Mapcrew too, you can apply even if you're under the age of 18, but you won't be considered for a position as a full Mapcrew member unless you're 18+. |
Alexa172001 « Citoyen » 1580772240000
| 0 | ||
Yes,true. I said that aswell. He wouldn't be 18 by the set date except for the previous applications. If it was waited on him to turn 18 then that's odd aswell. Also if it's not so secretive and since it means no shit why not say exactly which applications they were hired from,hm? Or you guys just talk without knowing. Also if it was from the apps in July could say "yes,they WERE indeed hired from that" Rather than they might've been. |
2 | ||
That’s private and not really the public’s concern when a moderator was originally hired onto the staff team. |
Alexa172001 « Citoyen » 1580772480000
| 0 | ||
I don't see how it's private as it reveals no personal information about the applicant. And since you see me being bothered you could confirm,or maybe you can't?~ Dernière modification le 1580772540000 |
4 | ||
No, I can’t confirm. If you want any further explanation, please contact a moderator in private. This isn’t really the place to continue this conversation. |
Stormbreaker « Censeur » 1580773080000
| 14 | ||
It's information which isn't really relevant, or what the public needs to know. Like other mod-related things ;) Some mods might also feel uncomfortable revealing what round of apps they were hired in, as some take longer than others to be trained. Now, this is not a bad thing at all, as everyone is different! But I know i'd feel uncomfortable if people knew when I was hired. Congrats Alfie! Welcome to the spam party!!! |
Alexa172001 1580773260000
| | ||
[Modéré par Inkzooka, raison : As said before, if you want any further explanation or to continue your discussion please contact a moderator in private, thanks!] Dernière modification le 1580773380000 |