/support

Mousechris a dit :

Lol see this is how you debate, not like fxie where she rages, you argue respectfully with honner. :3

Hozaku a dit :

The people in this thread are retarded.

*cough* "respectfully" *cough*

Anyway, Impuredeath FTW! Still if I have some speed I can go through the other way again... :/
And used like 4 grounds and 2 nails while with this new ground you could only waste 1 ground... Althought that, I saw magic on Impuredeath's XML *-* Teach me master!

By the way, this is just my opinion, you can criticize it, but dont call retarded to people who want to question this idea.

From what I understand:


You mean close to exactly the same thing everyone else has been telling you in this thread, except this time it's from impuredeath? Yeah.



To make how it works even more obvious.

Like, seriously, this is some hardcore brownosing here, and I learned what I know of map making from Impuredeath's videos.

I just....can't keep reading your posts. My IQ is dropping from this.

How can people be this arrogant?

Let's get back to poster's idea please, an idea just appeared and Ill be in paint e.e'

Ad Hominem: You attacked your opponent's character or personal traits instead of engaging with their argument.

Ad hominem attacks can take the form of overtly attacking somebody, or more subtly casting doubt on their character or personal attributes. The desired result of an ad hom attack is to undermine one's opponent without actually having to engage with their argument or present a compelling argument of one's own.

Why don't you start addressing the fact that you treated the exact same solution suggested to you completely differently, just because it was from someone else?

P.S: This applies to Beastmatt too

Gangsterpt a dit :

Althought that, I saw magic on Impuredeath's XML *-* Teach me master!

Lmbo.

Hozaku a dit :

Ad Hominem: You attacked your opponent's character or personal traits instead of engaging with their argument.

Ad hominem attacks can take the form of overtly attacking somebody, or more subtly casting doubt on their character or personal attributes. The desired result of an ad hom attack is to undermine one's opponent without actually having to engage with their argument or present a compelling argument of one's own.

Why don't you start addressing the fact that you treated the exact same solution suggested to you completely differently, just because it was from someone else?

i say stop being a dick wad say support or no support (explain why) then leave.
SIMPLE

Raouldufy a dit :

i say stop being a dick wad say support or no support (explain why) then leave.
SIMPLE

I'm not even going to start up an argument with you because judging by your entire page's worth of responses on pages 4~5, you are hilariously misinformed about everything relevant to this suggestion.

Hozaku a dit :

I'm not even going to start up an argument with you because judging by your entire page's worth of responses on pages 4~5, you are hilariously misinformed about everything relevant to this suggestion.

im ending this now by saying


i support this

Don't say you're not being arrogant using that argument of the ad hominem falacy. How it is a falacy if the proof is right at your replys? We're not in a tribunal ffs, and you throwing any stupid arguments that you can copy-paste.
And how funny, hypocrit by appointing a falacy that you made too.
Now have a nice cup of Shut the F*** up, or Ill call a mod.
(Next argument: calling the autorities is being coward) No, you may suggest a forum for Fights with Arguments, you may prove your arrogance on another place.

Hozaku a dit :

Why don't you start addressing the fact that you treated the exact same solution suggested to you completely differently, just because it was from someone else?

P.S: This applies to Beastmatt too

I see you're still completely avoiding this.

Hozaku a dit :

I see you're still completely avoiding this.

Gangsterpt a dit :

Don't say you're not being arrogant using that argument of the ad hominem falacy. How it is a falacy if the proof is right at your replys? We're not in a tribunal ffs, and you throwing any stupid arguments that you can copy-paste.
And how funny, hypocrit by appointing a falacy that you made too.
Now have a nice cup of Shut the F*** up, or Ill call a mod.
(Next argument: calling the autorities is being coward) No, you may suggest a forum for Fights with Arguments, you may prove your arrogance on another place.

STOP ARGUING SAY IF YOU SUPPORT THIS OR NOR AND IF NOT SAY WHY

And I did. This entire thing has been an extended "why this suggestion is not necessary". It's been proved you need only 2 grounds and an object to nearly perfectly replicate this suggestion.

Whos avoiding here? The point was the same yeah, but only treated it that way because I didn't knew the mechanism.
And with "arrogant" I ment the IQ part/ retard part/ "ohh I just cant read more replys..." Like you are better than them, than us. You are no more than anyone, as we are no more than you.

Raouldufy a dit :

STOP ARGUING SAY IF YOU SUPPORT THIS OR NOR AND IF NOT SAY WHY

I did supported already.

-delete this reply- didnt wanted to double post...

Gangsterpt a dit :

Whos avoiding here? The point was the same yeah, but only treated it that way because I didn't knew the mechanism.
And with "arrogant" I ment the IQ part/ retard part/ "ohh I just cant read more replys..." Like you are better than them, than us. You are no more than anyone, as we are no more than you.

Yes, you did not understand the mechanism. Yet you have vehemently argued against anyone else's suggestions, which turned out to be extremely similar to the one you DID completely agree with. This means, quite simply, that you were /wrong/. If you were willing to accept that Impuredeath's mechanism has rendered OP's suggestion redundant, you have to accept everyone else's too.

Hozaku a dit :

Yes, you did not understand the mechanism. Yet you have vehemently argued against anyone else's suggestions, which turned out to be extremely similar to the one you DID completely agree with. This means, quite simply, that you were /wrong/. If you were willing to accept that Impuredeath's mechanism has rendered OP's suggestion redundant, you have to accept everyone else's too.

True I didn't reacted the Impuredeath's suggestion same way as yours, and that I was wrong. But that doesn't give you the right to act like a "dick", no offense.

None taken, I am totally a dick.

So as I.
Back to bussiness, I'm gonna proceed with a scheme I'm making for this ground idea.

Hozaku a dit :

None taken, I am totally a dick.

stfu & gtfo then unless you have a good point to make

Raouldufy a dit :

stfu & gtfo then unless you have a good point to make

Easy, no need to be that rude!