AUGUST-SEPTEMBER 2013 OFFICIAL MAPMAKING CONTEST

#161

GoodLuck contestants.

#162

Cat5@4054204

#163

Cat2@4149504

#164

I've just fixed up a few submissions that weren't correct, and deleted some that were grossly incorrect.

As a reminder, please make sure you read over the global rules for the mapmaking contest before submitting your maps Topic-225656 Otherwise you risk your maps being disqualified from the start.

#165

what is the end of the contest pls ?

#166

Topic-225656

Fifth "•"

#167

Cat5@4150963

#168

random q,can i participate in six cat's ? and,can i participate in one cat with more than 1 map? idk how to read rules,so pls explain me here.

#169

If you are capable of reading an explanation here, you are capable of reading the rules.

Topic-225656

#170

Cat4@4151101

#171

Barrydarsow a dit :
If you are capable of reading an explanation here, you are capable of reading the rules.

Topic-225656

:(
I DID IT!

#172

Aqvaswirle a dit :
P6 is only when the concept is based on the mechanism playing a serious role in the gameplay.

If in the map, the shaman does indeed have a serious role in the map's gameplay (without it, the map is infeasible), needs to handle shaman objects (which play a big role in the gameplay) as the category's wording states but doesn't necessarily needs to "build" something to get to cheese and hole, can it still be considered for category 3 since nothing says it is compulsory for the shaman to "construct" something with the pre-included shaman objects in the map, but simply "to make use of some sham objects that are part of the map" ?

#173

Cat5@4127907

#174

hi for category 5 (vanilla parody), can it be an art map?

#175

Vvarriorw a dit :
If in the map, the shaman does indeed have a serious role in the map's gameplay (without it, the map is infeasible), needs to handle shaman objects (which play a big role in the gameplay) as the category's wording states but doesn't necessarily needs to "build" something to get to cheese and hole, can it still be considered for category 3 since nothing says it is compulsory for the shaman to "construct" something with the pre-included shaman objects in the map, but simply "to make use of some sham objects that are part of the map" ?

OP a dit :
requires the shaman to make use of some sham objects that are part of the map.

What, sorry? How else should they "handle" (read: "make use of...") shaman objects than just anchoring other objects (planks etc) to them? Push them or such? Then it won't be a shaman map. I hoped it was clear by the common sense that shaman maps require namely building. And building consists of using sham stuff obstacles as an anchorage.

Epalk a dit :
hi for category 5 (vanilla parody), can it be an art map?

No, it should be a Miscellaneous map (Collision/soulmate/etc modes aren't obligatory.)

#176

Cat2@4142291
Cat3@3809935

#177

Aqvaswirle a dit :
What, sorry? How else should they "handle" (read: "make use of...") shaman objects than just anchoring other objects (planks etc) to them? Push them or such? Then it won't be a shaman map. I hoped it was clear by the common sense that shaman maps require namely building. And building consists of using sham stuff obstacles as an anchorage.

I had more thought about the main use of cannons/runes/balloons/invisible boxes to move current objects which aren't considered as "building" something in my opinion, but I guess it will be fine no matter what, thanks for the clarification.

#178

Cat4@4152672

#179

Removed.

#180

In cat6, we can duplicate the cloud of xml ?

English	Français
Português do Brasil	Español
Türkçe	Polski
Magyar	Română
العربية	Skandinavisk
Nederlands	Deutsch
Bahasa Indonesia	Русский
中文	Filipino
Lietuvių kalba	日本語
Suomi	עברית
Italiano	Česky
Hrvatski	Slovensky
Български	Latviešu
Estonian

Langue