I don't think I've seen this around.

On a site called IMO.IM, which is like a discussion forum meets Facebook, the topic creator has the right to ban users from their "broadcasts" (topics) if they don't like how they're acting.
Of course on this forum, it could be abused, but I think it'd be a good idea. Just be sure to police it carefully, and allow sentinels to have a log of who has been banned from what topic.

PROS:
- Allows users who are provoked by others to remove them so they don't have to deal with the abuse
- Makes blacklists for tribe threads a thing of the past and easier to manage.

CONS:
- Abuse could run amuck, which is why sentinels would have to work a little harder.

Sorry but I don't agree with this, there is nothing wrong in replying in a topic :/, users are free to post in any topic if they aren't breaking any rules.

Maxxzinnn a dit :

Sorry but I don't agree with this, there is nothing wrong in replying in a topic :/, users are free to post in any topic if they aren't breaking any rules.

Why Barry had to stop deleting all of Fxies comments from Mapcrew threads because he "blacklisted her from all mapcrew threads"

so I agree with you If people comment with rude comments they will be muted /no support

Maxxzinnn a dit :

Sorry but I don't agree with this, there is nothing wrong in replying in a topic :/, users are free to post in any topic if they aren't breaking any rules.

Art threads: Person posting multiple times wanting art but is denied.
Tribes: Person who is blacklisted continues to post.

Plus, as Mausi said.

yes please

^
We'll be saving that suggestion for another day. Only one extreme forum suggestion a day. :]

It's a good idea, but usually some people just troll for fun, then that could cause them to get banned. And as the game says, trolling is a part of the game. But this is a forum, so

/Support

People should be able to say give critisism for critisism is the best medicine and could make your suggestions stronger.
/No Support

Killaninja a dit :

People should be able to say give critisism for critisism is the best medicine and could make your suggestions stronger.
/No Support

i agree with this

Haruhitastic a dit :

Art threads: Person posting multiple times wanting art but is denied.
Tribes: Person who is blacklisted continues to post.

for this I just report the problem.
this power could be abused like you said,people could just ban people who don't support their idea

/no support

Killaninja a dit :

People should be able to say give critisism for critisism is the best medicine and could make your suggestions stronger.
/No Support

Haruhitastic a dit :

Just be sure to police it carefully, and allow sentinels to have a log of who has been banned from what topic.

.

Guys, stop reading bits and pieces of my suggestion. :P

/support

dem annoying people who

Haruhitastic a dit :

Art threads: Person posting multiple times wanting art but is denied.
Tribes: Person who is blacklisted continues to post.

Plus, as Mausi said.

^

wait wut abt the second part mausi said o.o

Kattiej a dit :

wait wut abt the second part mausi said o.o

Mausibiene a dit :

There are cases where users don't break rules but are just incredibly annoying for the sake of it (or they're just completely oblivious to their own idiocy), so I find a scenario like that to be totally plausible.

I'd much have it so only Sentinels can ban someone from a topic though to prevent abuse.

Scrolling up for Mausipost is fun.

ik wut it is but it changes half of the suggestion

No it doesn't? It's a justification of why it's necessary.

Okay, let's look at it this way.

- You have a tribe topic
- Someone asks if they can join
- You have them apply
- They are denied
- They continue to ask to join
- You tell them they are denied
- They CONTINUE to ask.

Sure you can place them on a blacklist, but it's not a proper barrier. They can still post at any time in it.

/support, Nice idea Haru.