Should You Wait 1Hr To Marry? |
Lunawashere « Citoyen » 1463990580000
| |||
|
Cchiiko « Citoyen » 1478367720000
| 0 | ||
An hour isn't that long if you're on the Internet |
Coffeex3 « Citoyen » 1478413200000
| 0 | ||
soulmates are useless for me so i wouldnt really care |
Taco2006 « Citoyen » 1478425920000
| 0 | ||
I'd prefer waiting 20 mins. |
Whiteyewolf « Citoyen » 1478449260000
| 0 | ||
Probably something like 30 minutes would be better, but waiting a hour isn't too bad imo. plus to me i don't find a point for soulmates but eh Dernière modification le 1478449560000 |
Atearatareta « Censeur » 1478452680000
| 0 | ||
LunaWasHere a dit : did i type a year? i meant five years, sorry |
Laderik « Censeur » 1478457420000
| 0 | ||
No! Don't mix time with love. =3 |
Lunawashere « Citoyen » 1479274200000
| 0 | ||
Milkandsurreal a dit : When the hell did I type that?! |
0 | ||
Uh..Tbh, waiting an hour prevents marriage-divorce spree so, this rule shouldn't be changed. |
Parpgem « Censeur » 1602226200000
| 0 | ||
it depends tbh. let's say, that you marry someone and then you divorce. waiting for one hour.. it could be worth it if you're waiting on someone and they like you, and you like them back. like i said, it could be worth it if you were in that situation. then there could be a better chance of you guys staying together or not. this is my opinion. |
Dean_dale « Citoyen » 1603779060000
| 1 | ||
No i dont think there should be a 1 hour limit. Back in 2002 i got divorced with my wife and found a new one just 20 minutes later. We were married in vegas the following night |
0 | ||
why does this need to be changed at all??? all it is is just some extra line of text on your profile |