Fxie a dit :

He was not *the* first, and given how completely obvious the idea is (everyone thought of this), it certainly wasn't an innovative step forward. I think you're looking at the username here. This map should be judged fairly, not because of who made or nor, even if it were the case as it is not, being "innovative." Many old perms that were decent at the time SUCK and really need to go. First doesn't mean better and rotation certainly suffers every time map crew thinks so.

Also, the second got discussed for P4, whereas many did not even reach that point. Why was this one chosen to be discussed above all others that were no less original than it?

Fxie a dit :

Second half of your post.

Reviews should be done right the first time. I'm certainly not interested in making another P11 list when reviewing maps isn't even my job.

Fxie a dit :

Whoa it's like you quoted nothing


Anyways, I'm actually not trying to say good maps were missed (but I'm sure if you consider the ones that weren't good, then good ones were), but rather the ones that were chosen were no better than the ones called generic, and I don't quite understand what makes them different. My question was already answered, though: because "they were first."

New question: how was this determined?

Aqvaswirle a dit :

But Impure one of the first mapmakers used the new technique.

Travelingpik a dit :

Tests don't need icons. We really do need an easy bc one though lol.

Aqvaswirle a dit :

Why do you think so? For instance, fight minigame maps are all P32'd and it'd look more aesthetically literate if they rotated in rooms with icons.