Anythin a dit :

If you want to revert people's changes, why allow them to make these changes in the first place? It sounds pretty stupid. If you can't trust your tribe members to use their permissions the way you want, you shouldn't allow them to have them.

This suggestion doesn't solve the real problem, it's rather symptom treatment. The real problem is that tribe members can't use their permissions responsibly. What are you going to do if the people that are given permission to revert changes abuse this too?

Sometimes people can go renegade... You can never 100% trust someone and they or you might do it my mistake and if well they do do that then you can revert it and kick them

Eraoneofthe a dit :

Sometimes people can go renegade... You can never 100% trust someone and they or you might do it my mistake and if well they do do that then you can revert it and kick them

Maybe you're just trusting the wrong players. That's pretty much what it comes down to. I am confident enough to say the people in my tribe who have permissions can be trusted 100%, otherwise they would not have the permissions that are given to them.

The difference is your tribe is also full of mature people. A large majority of tribes are not.

If immaturity was a thing the admins had to keep in mind, then this game would have looked a lot more different. This is really beyond their care since the tribe leader him/herself decides who gets tribe permissions and who doesn't.
If you invite immature people to your tribe and you decide to give them permissions, you have to accept the consequences when it turns out you made the wrong decision. Carelessness should not be a reason to have suggestions implemented when these situations can easily be avoided.