/Support :3
——————————————————————————
Would be helpfull for those tribes who only want members with good stats, and want there tribe to have a high rank, or don't want 'noobs' in their tribes.

/nosupport because ranker tribes smell, I dislike ’em

Sandermr a dit :

Now I know most you are probably thinking "But moepl's tribebot already does this!" but not everyone can keep their bot online 24/7.

The bot can't do bootcamps, so /support :3

what about "add other requirement" for example -> Walljumper, Fight, etc

/Support

I do not support.

I wouldn't want for people to promote the idea of stats being important to a tribe because a good tribe isn't about stats, but about being with good friends/people. If you're able to set requirements for tribes it will only look like stats are the only important aspect of tribes, which seems like an illusion to me.

/support

I only disagree with the part about kicking old members who don't meet newly-raised reqs unless I read this wrong.

Sandermr a dit :

If he/she edits the requirements and an existing member does not meet it a pop up appears saying "The following members do not meet the requirements, continue?", continuing would kick them from the tribe thus the tribe leader having to be careful to choose who can edit this!

What do you mean by "edit"? Did you mean editing the tribe reqs or editing who get kicked and who don't?

support

Fluffyshine a dit :

/nosupport because ranker tribes smell, I dislike ’em

*claps*

Ravynn a dit :

I do not support.

I wouldn't want for people to promote the idea of stats being important to a tribe because a good tribe isn't about stats, but about being with good friends/people. If you're able to set requirements for tribes it will only look like stats are the only important aspect of tribes, which seems like an illusion to me.

I understand what you're trying to say and take your critic of the idea onboard as you atleast explained it, but either way, even if this doesn't get implented to the game, tribes will continue to have reqs no matter what, a tribe leader can decide what he wants for his tribe. Again, I left an option with "None" for the tribes without reqs anyway so no tribe will be obligated to implent a requirement with this update.

Unicorm a dit :

/support

I only disagree with the part about kicking old members who don't meet newly-raised reqs unless I read this wrong.


What do you mean by "edit"? Did you mean editing the tribe reqs or editing who get kicked and who don't?

Let's say a tribe has a requirement of 10 firsts but then a couple weeks later the tribe leader decides to change it to 30 firsts but some members don't meet the new requirements, he could choose whether to let them stay or automatically kick them by clicking yes or no.

/support

Sandermr a dit :

Let's say a tribe has a requirement of 10 firsts but then a couple weeks later the tribe leader decides to change it to 30 firsts but some members don't meet the new requirements, he could choose whether to let them stay or automatically kick them by clicking yes or no.

Then this suggestion is perfect <3

Sandermr a dit :

I understand what you're trying to say but either way, even if this doesn't get implented to the game, tribes will continue to have reqs no matter what, a tribe leader can decide what he wants with his tribe. Again, I left an option with "None" for the tribes without reqs anyway so no tribe will be obligated to implent a requirement with this update.

It's not about the function itself, it's about the message you're sending to players when you invent such a thing. (Oh whoops, posted with the wrong account, Ravynn is my alt)

support!

I /Support because im tired of people inviting random people who are nowhere near the tribe requirements. Saves alot of trouble.

Pkj a dit :

It's not about the function itself, it's about the message you're sending to players when you invent such a thing. (Oh whoops, posted with the wrong account, Ravynn is my alt)

Ok, although the suggestion was made to make tribe leader's life "easier" I accept your reason not to support.

Zaumgabriel a dit :

support!

Wuave a dit :

I /Support because im tired of people inviting random people who are nowhere near the tribe requirements. Saves alot of trouble.

Thank you

Ciarakiwisky a dit :

Like the idea, but what about bots? Also we have exceptions for people who don't meet them, but we have to ask them and stuff, not sure about this so far..

Bots arent on forever trust me i tried to keep mine on but my family kept turning it off D:&lt;
oh yah /half support i would like though if it just auto-matically ranked....

/support

Yeah, awesome. ^-^

/support