Multiple marriages |
0 | ||
hpocks a dit : lol what does jesus have to do with this |
Hpocks « Citoyen » 1443530520000
| 0 | ||
smartiewolfs a dit : Nothing really, I just decided to post a stupid irrelevant post on a stupid irrelevant idea. Dernière modification le 1443530580000 |
0 | ||
hpocks a dit : this isn't stupid?? its polygamy |
Olliethekit « Citoyen » 1443531240000
| 0 | ||
/nosupport I don't see any need in this. In my opinion, one soulmate is enough. I'm pretty sure your two or more soulmates would be angry/upset that you married someone else. It's basically cheating. Even though this is just a game, a few things are similar to real life. |
Hpocks « Citoyen » 1443532080000
| 0 | ||
smartiewolfs a dit : Polygamy in a mouse game, mind you. Its not like we are congress deciding if we should pass a polygamy law. If you want to be 'married' to multiple mice, you can roleplay that. You shouldnt need the game to implicate marrying 5 people to satisfied. Anyways, it would be a bad idea for children to introduce them to being in a relationship with multiple people. (Also known as affairs) Someone a dit : Well alot of kids play it anyways, so dont even say that. I find it funny that people are taking this seriously. "They will be upset that you are cheating" Just lol'd Dernière modification le 1443532140000 |
0 | ||
Hpocks a dit : you can just call this useless instead of stupid? polygamy is a serious tradition, which is a matter of fact that many people are considering it cheating, and they end up debating against it i can't really see the stupid in this |
Hpocks « Citoyen » 1443532920000
| 0 | ||
Im going to leave the polygamy community now and not deal with a polygamy debate. |
Haruhitastic « Censeur » 1443536700000
| 1 | ||
the stupidity is people taking this 100% serious when it's a mouse game to be frank if you're actually offended about a suggestion about polygamy then i dont know what to say to you there's no harm in polyamorous relationships if all parties are consenting btw, it's only considered an affair if the parties dont consent |
Hpocks « Citoyen » 1443537660000
| 0 | ||
Haruhitastic a dit : Thank you. I have a gut feeling that this thread will get locked in a bit after replies come in though, but that is probably a good thank. |
Coollifelala « Citoyen » 1443544500000
| 0 | ||
/nosupport Sonicherois a dit : Dernière modification le 1443544560000 |
0 | ||
/no support why 2? |
Beran_setaou « Citoyen » 1443612840000
| 0 | ||
melodicmello a dit : I also don't see anything wrong with this, so I support this idea as long as it doesn't mess up the profile way more than it is, and if there is a limit like mentionned above. |
Squirrelmows « Citoyen » 1443619800000
| 0 | ||
fnafmike a dit : it's not madatory... I mean, if you don't want multiple spouses, only marry one.And if you don't want your spouse to have other spouses, that's something you should discuss before you marry them:P if people are really stupid enough to marry random people without even discussing what their stance in marriage is then they deserve to get hurt if another party decides to follow a different path, as you should have atleast known eachother enough to tell if you were the only one for them BEFORE you married them :P also a certain amount of trust is needed, but then again...it is just a mouse game. tldr: if you don't want it, just marry one. You can't force your spouse to abide by certain rules, that's why there's trust in any relatioship |
Antonio « Sénateur » 1443630360000
| 0 | ||
hpocks a dit : OMFG |
Opicalneon « Citoyen » 1443658080000
| 0 | ||
fnafmike a dit : what do you mean? if you only wanted one soulmate, then marry only one soulmate. you don't have to have multiple soulmates if you don't want to |
0 | ||
This is what tribes are for. /nosupport |
Satash « Citoyen » 1443661260000
| 0 | ||
I like this idea because I feel that having only one soulmate limits people in polygamous relationships. It doesn't matter if it clutters somebody's profile if it means something to them. You can already have an 'affair' by other means, but multiple partners do not mean it's an affair. If all parties are consenting, like Haruhitastic have stated, then it is a polygamous relationship. If all parties are not consenting then it is an affair. Edit: What if all parties have a pop-up to confirm the polygamous marriage? If people wish to marry more than one, then go for it. If people wish to marry only one, then don't marry more. hpocks a dit : It doesn't matter if a lot of children play this game. Introducing polygamy or multiple partners (that are all consenting) is an excellent idea to show that monogamous relationships are not the only kind of relationship you can have. We already have no discrimination on gay marriage in the game, so why not polygamy? There's no harm in this. Many homophobic parents would say they wouldn't want to introduce their children to gay marriage. Many monogamous parents would say they wouldn't want to introduce their children to polygamous relationships. People usually just use the marriage feature to indicate strong friendship than an actual relationship. If the polygamous marriage feature was implemented, why not allow them to use the marry feature however they like? Anyways, yeah I like this idea a lot. /support. Dernière modification le 1443661320000 |
Eternalcool « Citoyen » 1443672960000
| 0 | ||
/halfsupport okay, so i DONT support it because 1, it can offend many others who dont believe polygamy is right, and they could unfriend you because of that. 2. honestly, i don't see the need to clug up your profile, we have so much useless junk on it and its bad enoughm so with " soulmate(s): ____ ________ _______ _____ is just annoying. alright, now onto reasons i do think it should be put. 1. if you ARE polygamy, it'd be great for you and the others now, maybe i'd fully agree if we would have a option to turn off the " multiple soulmates " thing if it were to come out. Dernière modification le 1443673020000 |
Hpocks « Citoyen » 1443709320000
| 0 | ||
Satash a dit : I really hope your joking. So you think it is good to teach kids about being slutty and having multiple partners? In most parts of the world, that would be considered illegal anyways, so yeah! Let them decide, dont force it on them via mouse game. Dernière modification le 1443709440000 |
Haruhitastic « Censeur » 1443709440000
| 0 | ||
Polyamory cannot be equated to sexual promiscuity, nor is there any reason to call people who practice it sluts. Again, like I said however... this is much ado over a troll suggestion. I'd say everyone took the bait well. |