[Gameplay] Choose who to revive |
Xconvictedx « Citoyen » 1427552280000
| 0 | ||
/no support cz it will increase favoism |
Happyjazyha « Citoyen » 1427553000000
| 0 | ||
That would be nice but it would lead to favorism /no support |
Mynerdyways « Citoyen » 1427553540000
| 0 | ||
/no support Favouring shamans will abuse this. |
Beran_setaou « Citoyen » 1431347700000
| 0 | ||
No support. |
Youkaywhy « Citoyen » 1431603900000
| 0 | ||
/no support I agree with others about favours. |
Nafien « Citoyen » 1431623460000
| 0 | ||
/no support favo.. |
0 | ||
Nice suggestion which would make favo even MORE OVERUSED lmfao bye /no support |
Papero « Citoyen » 1431683460000
| 0 | ||
Favoritism so no support |
Littlegumballs « Citoyen » 1431687300000
| 0 | ||
Just no /support very bad only if you didnt friend then i would support |
Voiletshu « Citoyen » 1431872880000
| 0 | ||
/no support because its unfair for other mice |
Noctoc « Citoyen » 1432249440000
| 0 | ||
No....as everyone said, It will increase insanely the actual favoring with the reviving |
Splatoon_2 « Citoyen » 1505421660000
| 0 | ||
/no support favoring gets even worse |
Totorodile « Citoyen » 1505422500000
| 0 | ||
/no support. people would just easily pick their friends to revive and it'd just make the whole concept unfair. |
Kazray « Censeur » 1505434680000
| 1 | ||
Splatoon_2 a dit : This thread was from like two years ago, and everyone two years ago didn't like it, so did you need to necro this thread to say you also don't like it? Trying my best not to sound rude, but... Dernière modification le 1505434740000 |
Eironeia « Sénateur » 1505435340000
| 0 | ||
No. Favo'ing will increase. A huge no support |
Ayumiouo « Consul » 1505436000000
| 0 | ||
/no support reason: tl;dr favo-ing Random is good :^) |
Lisa_w « Citoyen » 1505461740000
| 0 | ||
nosupp |
Ash_willow_iz « Consul » 1505462040000
| 0 | ||
/no support I like the way how it is now |
Kimsterjay « Consul » 1505464980000
| 0 | ||
No. Just no, |
Deifavy « Censeur » 1505472300000
| 0 | ||
/Nosupport Reasons stated above |