Anythin a dit :

While I understand the idea of this suggestion, I don't think we should give players these kind of powers. Instead, I think a hard coded room mouse limit based on the room name would be more efficiënt and is more impartial. For example creating the room survivor#10 would automatically limit the users to 10, survivor#11 to 11, survivor#20 to 20 and so on. Of course this would apply to all game modes, including bootcamp that has similar problems with flooded rooms.

^ This is the new concept of this whole thing. But below is the original suggestion. Thanks to Anythin for reformatting it the right way.

So, I am thinking about it in a way, that you could just write /limit X [maximum 50], which would allow people to control sizes of their rooms. That would let people not get interrupted or get a nice, small room, or keep one just below 10-11 mice, so that there won't be no possibility to get firsts [just to keep out padders, brazillians and overall first hoarders], and also because some people just hate it when they have to password the room everytime it reaches a set number, only to have a bunch of people leave later, and have them put the pw down again. Too much manual work. Setting a room limit would be an excellent way to optimize it, giving a bunch of new tools to people who like to make public rooms, but hate them being too big.

That's about the best way I could explain it.

lmfao. Why do so many people want Brazilians out of English rooms so badly.

/support

Gre3em a dit :

Setting a room limit would be an excellent way to optimize it, giving a bunch of new tools to people who like to make public rooms, but hate them being too big.

The point of a public room is that it is 100% public, not public to a certain number of players and then locked for the rest until someone leaves. Public rooms have to be available for everyone

The only way I will support this if it were to be implemented for international/ private rooms with your username in the room title (*Grimmaro)

Grimmaro a dit :

Gre3em a dit :VoirMasquer

Setting a room limit would be an excellent way to optimize it, giving a bunch of new tools to people who like to make public rooms, but hate them being too big.

The point of a public room is that it is 100% public, not public to a certain number of players and then locked for the rest until someone leaves. Public rooms have to be available for everyone

The only way I will support this if it were to be implemented for international/ private rooms with your username in the room title (*Grimmaro)

You see, when you are making a private room, you call it whatever, and add a gamemode somewhere in the roomname. If you want to make it public, it's gamemode and a number, for example surivor01. Thus, every single room that's called for example "Survivor with cannonballs" is sort-of private. Thus, allowing it to be limited. Just think about it!

Gre3em a dit :

Grimmaro a dit :VoirMasquer

Gre3em a dit :VoirMasquer

Setting a room limit would be an excellent way to optimize it, giving a bunch of new tools to people who like to make public rooms, but hate them being too big.

The point of a public room is that it is 100% public, not public to a certain number of players and then locked for the rest until someone leaves. Public rooms have to be available for everyone

The only way I will support this if it were to be implemented for international/ private rooms with your username in the room title (*Grimmaro)

You see, when you are making a private room, you call it whatever, and add a gamemode somewhere in the roomname. If you want to make it public, it's gamemode and a number, for example surivor01. Thus, every single room that's called for example "Survivor with cannonballs" is sort-of private. Thus, allowing it to be limited. Just think about it!

The idea that you want the room admin to put on a player limit in his/her room while also having the intent of having that room being public too isn't fair. It's not actually public if the room is only available to the few players who make it in before others do. Sure I understand what you are saying about "sort of private" rooms but as long as you can access it from the room list, it it completely public, unless of course, the room admin decides to add a password later on, which obviously takes it off of the room list and makes it private

I hope I got my point clear

Grimmaro a dit :

Gre3em a dit :VoirMasquer

Grimmaro a dit :VoirMasquer

Gre3em a dit :VoirMasquer

Setting a room limit would be an excellent way to optimize it, giving a bunch of new tools to people who like to make public rooms, but hate them being too big.

The point of a public room is that it is 100% public, not public to a certain number of players and then locked for the rest until someone leaves. Public rooms have to be available for everyone

The only way I will support this if it were to be implemented for international/ private rooms with your username in the room title (*Grimmaro)

You see, when you are making a private room, you call it whatever, and add a gamemode somewhere in the roomname. If you want to make it public, it's gamemode and a number, for example surivor01. Thus, every single room that's called for example "Survivor with cannonballs" is sort-of private. Thus, allowing it to be limited. Just think about it!

The idea that you want the room admin to put on a player limit in his/her room while also having the intent of having that room being public too isn't fair. It's not actually public if the room is only available to the few players who make it in before others do. Sure I understand what you are saying about "sort of private" rooms but as long as you can access it from the room list, it it completely public, unless of course, the room admin decides to add a password later on, which obviously takes it off of the room list and makes it private

I hope I got my point clear

Hey, look at it that way: not every single room will set a player limit, so public rooms willl remain public, and some of them will be public... when others will leave them. so it's kind-of-a win/win situation. And about the game being fair... It never was fair. And having a player limit to me is much better than having 5 crybabies speaking spanish in an english-only server and dieing everytime they don't get a first, making the whole shamman process difficult and inefficent. There will be losses, but in return, you get much more.

While I understand the idea of this suggestion, I don't think we should give players these kind of powers. Instead, I think a hard coded room mouse limit based on the room name would be more efficiënt and is more impartial. For example creating the room survivor#10 would automatically limit the users to 10, survivor#11 to 11, survivor#20 to 20 and so on. Of course this would apply to all game modes, including bootcamp that has similar problems with flooded rooms.

Anythin a dit :

While I understand the idea of this suggestion, I don't think we should give players these kind of powers. Instead, I think a hard coded room mouse limit based on the room name would be more efficiënt and is more impartial. For example creating the room survivor#10 would automatically limit the users to 10, survivor#11 to 11, survivor#20 to 20 and so on. Of course this would apply to all game modes, including bootcamp that has similar problems with flooded rooms.

I like this.

Anythin a dit :

While I understand the idea of this suggestion, I don't think we should give players these kind of powers. Instead, I think a hard coded room mouse limit based on the room name would be more efficiënt and is more impartial. For example creating the room survivor#10 would automatically limit the users to 10, survivor#11 to 11, survivor#20 to 20 and so on. Of course this would apply to all game modes, including bootcamp that has similar problems with flooded rooms.

God damn, that's actually perfect.

Anythin a dit :

While I understand the idea of this suggestion, I don't think we should give players these kind of powers. Instead, I think a hard coded room mouse limit based on the room name would be more efficiënt and is more impartial. For example creating the room survivor#10 would automatically limit the users to 10, survivor#11 to 11, survivor#20 to 20 and so on. Of course this would apply to all game modes, including bootcamp that has similar problems with flooded rooms.

^^^
I SUPPORT THIS

w-wait. That means vanilla1 will only have 1 mouse there
and the rest with v2 v3 v4

Yanderlyne a dit :

Anythin a dit :VoirMasquer

While I understand the idea of this suggestion, I don't think we should give players these kind of powers. Instead, I think a hard coded room mouse limit based on the room name would be more efficiënt and is more impartial. For example creating the room survivor#10 would automatically limit the users to 10, survivor#11 to 11, survivor#20 to 20 and so on. Of course this would apply to all game modes, including bootcamp that has similar problems with flooded rooms.

^^^
I SUPPORT THIS

w-wait. That means vanilla1 will only have 1 mouse there
and the rest with v2 v3 v4

Vanilla1 and Vanilla1#1 would be two different rooms.

/supp
only if you are the first on that room

/support
I hate it when I make a pub room then a bunch of people come in and it gets to laggy for me to really play

Massive support. Time to not lag in bootcamp.